The base of the logarithmic identity. Basic logarithmic identity

(from Greek λόγος - “word”, “relation” and ἀριθμός - “number”) numbers b based on a(log α b) is called such a number c, And b= a c, that is, records log α b=c And b=ac are equivalent. The logarithm makes sense if a > 0, a ≠ 1, b > 0.

In other words logarithm numbers b based on A formulated as an exponent to which a number must be raised a to get the number b(logarithm exists only for positive numbers).

From this formulation it follows that the calculation x= log α b, is equivalent to solving the equation a x =b.

For example:

log 2 8 = 3 because 8 = 2 3 .

Let us emphasize that the indicated formulation of the logarithm makes it possible to immediately determine logarithm value, when the number under the logarithm sign acts as a certain power of the base. Indeed, the formulation of the logarithm makes it possible to justify that if b=a c, then the logarithm of the number b based on a equals With. It is also clear that the topic of logarithms is closely related to the topic powers of a number.

Calculating the logarithm is called logarithm. Logarithm is the mathematical operation of taking a logarithm. When taking logarithms, products of factors are transformed into sums of terms.

Potentiation is a mathematical operation inverse to logarithm. During potentiation, a given base is raised to the degree of expression over which potentiation is performed. In this case, the sums of terms are transformed into a product of factors.

Quite often, real logarithms are used with bases 2 (binary), Euler's number e ≈ 2.718 (natural logarithm) and 10 (decimal).

At this stage it is advisable to consider logarithm samples log 7 2 , ln 5, lg0.0001.

And the entries lg(-3), log -3 3.2, log -1 -4.3 do not make sense, since in the first of them a negative number is placed under the logarithm sign, in the second - a negative number in the base, and in the third - both a negative number under the logarithm sign and a unit in the base.

Conditions for determining the logarithm.

It is worth considering separately the conditions a > 0, a ≠ 1, b > 0.under which we get definition of logarithm. Let's look at why these restrictions were taken. An equality of the form x = log α will help us with this b, called the basic logarithmic identity, which directly follows from the definition of logarithm given above.

Let's take the condition a≠1. Since one to any power is equal to one, then the equality x=log α b can only exist when b=1, but log 1 1 will be any real number. To eliminate this ambiguity, we take a≠1.

Let us prove the necessity of the condition a>0. At a=0 According to the formulation of the logarithm, it can only exist when b=0. And accordingly then log 0 0 can be any non-zero real number, since zero to any non-zero power is zero. This ambiguity can be eliminated by the condition a≠0. And when a<0 we would have to reject the analysis of rational and irrational values ​​of the logarithm, since a degree with a rational and irrational exponent is defined only for non-negative bases. It is for this reason that the condition is stipulated a>0.

AND last condition b>0 follows from inequality a>0, since x=log α b, and the value of the degree with a positive base a always positive.

Features of logarithms.

Logarithms characterized by distinctive features, which led to their widespread use to significantly facilitate painstaking calculations. When moving “into the world of logarithms,” multiplication is transformed into a much easier addition, division is transformed into subtraction, and exponentiation and root extraction are transformed, respectively, into multiplication and division by the exponent.

Formulation of logarithms and table of their values ​​(for trigonometric functions) was first published in 1614 by the Scottish mathematician John Napier. Logarithmic tables, enlarged and detailed by other scientists, were widely used in scientific and engineering calculations, and remained relevant until the use of electronic calculators and computers.


We continue to study logarithms. In this article we will talk about calculating logarithms, this process is called logarithm. First we will understand the calculation of logarithms by definition. Next, let's look at how the values ​​of logarithms are found using their properties. After this, we will focus on calculating logarithms through the initially specified values ​​of other logarithms. Finally, let's learn how to use logarithm tables. The entire theory is provided with examples with detailed solutions.

Page navigation.

Calculating logarithms by definition

In the simplest cases it is possible to perform quite quickly and easily finding the logarithm by definition. Let's take a closer look at how this process happens.

Its essence is to represent the number b in the form a c, from which, by the definition of a logarithm, the number c is the value of the logarithm. That is, by definition, the following chain of equalities corresponds to finding the logarithm: log a b=log a a c =c.

So, calculating a logarithm by definition comes down to finding a number c such that a c = b, and the number c itself is the desired value of the logarithm.

Taking into account the information in the previous paragraphs, when the number under the logarithm sign is given by a certain power of the logarithm base, you can immediately indicate what the logarithm is equal to - it is equal to the exponent. Let's show solutions to examples.

Example.

Find log 2 2 −3, and also calculate the natural logarithm of the number e 5,3.

Solution.

The definition of the logarithm allows us to immediately say that log 2 2 −3 =−3. Indeed, the number under the logarithm sign is equal to base 2 to the −3 power.

Similarly, we find the second logarithm: lne 5.3 =5.3.

Answer:

log 2 2 −3 =−3 and lne 5,3 =5,3.

If the number b under the logarithm sign is not specified as a power of the base of the logarithm, then you need to carefully look to see if it is possible to come up with a representation of the number b in the form a c . Often this representation is quite obvious, especially when the number under the logarithm sign is equal to the base to the power of 1, or 2, or 3, ...

Example.

Calculate the logarithms log 5 25 , and .

Solution.

It is easy to see that 25=5 2, this allows you to calculate the first logarithm: log 5 25=log 5 5 2 =2.

Let's move on to calculating the second logarithm. The number can be represented as a power of 7: (see if necessary). Hence, .

Let's rewrite the third logarithm in the following form. Now you can see that , from which we conclude that . Therefore, by the definition of logarithm .

Briefly, the solution could be written as follows: .

Answer:

log 5 25=2 , And .

When under the logarithm sign there is a sufficiently large natural number, then it wouldn’t hurt to factor it into prime factors. It often helps to represent such a number as some power of the base of the logarithm, and therefore calculate this logarithm by definition.

Example.

Find the value of the logarithm.

Solution.

Some properties of logarithms allow you to immediately specify the value of logarithms. These properties include the property of the logarithm of one and the property of the logarithm of a number equal to the base: log 1 1=log a a 0 =0 and log a a=log a a 1 =1. That is, when under the sign of the logarithm there is a number 1 or a number a equal to the base of the logarithm, then in these cases the logarithms are equal to 0 and 1, respectively.

Example.

What are logarithms and log10 equal to?

Solution.

Since , then from the definition of logarithm it follows .

In the second example, the number 10 under the logarithm sign coincides with its base, so the decimal logarithm of ten is equal to one, that is, lg10=lg10 1 =1.

Answer:

AND lg10=1 .

Note that the calculation of logarithms by definition (which we discussed in the previous paragraph) implies the use of the equality log a a p =p, which is one of the properties of logarithms.

In practice, when a number under the logarithm sign and the base of the logarithm are easily represented as a power of a certain number, it is very convenient to use the formula , which corresponds to one of the properties of logarithms. Let's look at an example of finding a logarithm that illustrates the use of this formula.

Example.

Calculate the logarithm.

Solution.

Answer:

.

Properties of logarithms not mentioned above are also used in calculations, but we will talk about this in the following paragraphs.

Finding logarithms through other known logarithms

The information in this paragraph continues the topic of using the properties of logarithms when calculating them. But here the main difference is that the properties of logarithms are used to express the original logarithm in terms of another logarithm, the value of which is known. Let's give an example for clarification. Let's say we know that log 2 3≈1.584963, then we can find, for example, log 2 6 by doing a little transformation using the properties of the logarithm: log 2 6=log 2 (2 3)=log 2 2+log 2 3≈ 1+1,584963=2,584963 .

In the above example, it was enough for us to use the property of the logarithm of a product. However, much more often it is necessary to use a wider arsenal of properties of logarithms in order to calculate the original logarithm through the given ones.

Example.

Calculate the logarithm of 27 to base 60 if you know that log 60 2=a and log 60 5=b.

Solution.

So we need to find log 60 27 . It is easy to see that 27 = 3 3, and the original logarithm, due to the property of the logarithm of the power, can be rewritten as 3·log 60 3.

Now let's see how to express log 60 3 in terms of known logarithms. The property of the logarithm of a number equal to the base allows us to write the equality log 60 60=1. On the other hand, log 60 60=log60(2 2 3 5)= log 60 2 2 +log 60 3+log 60 5= 2·log 60 2+log 60 3+log 60 5 . Thus, 2 log 60 2+log 60 3+log 60 5=1. Hence, log 60 3=1−2·log 60 2−log 60 5=1−2·a−b.

Finally, we calculate the original logarithm: log 60 27=3 log 60 3= 3·(1−2·a−b)=3−6·a−3·b.

Answer:

log 60 27=3·(1−2·a−b)=3−6·a−3·b.

Separately, it is worth mentioning the meaning of the formula for transition to a new base of the logarithm of the form . It allows you to move from logarithms with any base to logarithms with a specific base, the values ​​of which are known or it is possible to find them. Usually, from the original logarithm, using the transition formula, they move to logarithms in one of the bases 2, e or 10, since for these bases there are tables of logarithms that allow their values ​​to be calculated with a certain degree of accuracy. In the next paragraph we will show how this is done.

Logarithm tables and their uses

For approximate calculation of logarithm values ​​can be used logarithm tables. The most commonly used base 2 logarithm table is the table natural logarithms and a table of decimal logarithms. When working in the decimal number system, it is convenient to use a table of logarithms based on base ten. With its help we will learn to find the values ​​of logarithms.










The presented table allows you to find the values ​​of the decimal logarithms of numbers from 1,000 to 9,999 (with three decimal places) with an accuracy of one ten-thousandth. We will analyze the principle of finding the value of a logarithm using a table of decimal logarithms into specific example– it’s clearer that way. Let's find log1.256.

In the left column of the table of decimal logarithms we find the first two digits of the number 1.256, that is, we find 1.2 (this number is circled in blue for clarity). The third digit of the number 1.256 (digit 5) is found in the first or last line to the left of the double line (this number is circled in red). The fourth digit of the original number 1.256 (digit 6) is found in the first or last line to the right of the double line (this number is circled with a green line). Now we find the numbers in the cells of the table of logarithms at the intersection of the marked row and marked columns (these numbers are highlighted orange). The sum of the marked numbers gives the desired value of the decimal logarithm accurate to the fourth decimal place, that is, log1.236≈0.0969+0.0021=0.0990.

Is it possible, using the table above, to find the values ​​of decimal logarithms of numbers that have more than three digits after the decimal point, as well as those that go beyond the range from 1 to 9.999? Yes, you can. Let's show how this is done with an example.

Let's calculate lg102.76332. First you need to write down number in standard form: 102.76332=1.0276332·10 2. After this, the mantissa should be rounded to the third decimal place, we have 1.0276332 10 2 ≈1.028 10 2, while the original decimal logarithm is approximately equal to the logarithm of the resulting number, that is, we take log102.76332≈lg1.028·10 2. Now we apply the properties of the logarithm: lg1.028·10 2 =lg1.028+lg10 2 =lg1.028+2. Finally, we find the value of the logarithm lg1.028 from the table of decimal logarithms lg1.028≈0.0086+0.0034=0.012. As a result, the entire process of calculating the logarithm looks like this: log102.76332=log1.0276332 10 2 ≈lg1.028 10 2 = log1.028+lg10 2 =log1.028+2≈0.012+2=2.012.

In conclusion, it is worth noting that using a table of decimal logarithms you can calculate the approximate value of any logarithm. To do this, it is enough to use the transition formula to go to decimal logarithms, find their values ​​in the table, and perform the remaining calculations.

For example, let's calculate log 2 3 . According to the formula for transition to a new base of the logarithm, we have . From the table of decimal logarithms we find log3≈0.4771 and log2≈0.3010. Thus, .

Bibliography.

  • Kolmogorov A.N., Abramov A.M., Dudnitsyn Yu.P. and others. Algebra and the beginnings of analysis: Textbook for grades 10 - 11 of general education institutions.
  • Gusev V.A., Mordkovich A.G. Mathematics (a manual for those entering technical schools).

Logarithm of the number b (b > 0) to base a (a > 0, a ≠ 1)– exponent to which the number a must be raised to obtain b.

The base 10 logarithm of b can be written as log(b), and the logarithm to base e (natural logarithm) is ln(b).

Often used when solving problems with logarithms:

Properties of logarithms

There are four main properties of logarithms.

Let a > 0, a ≠ 1, x > 0 and y > 0.

Property 1. Logarithm of the product

Logarithm of the product equal to the sum of logarithms:

log a (x ⋅ y) = log a x + log a y

Property 2. Logarithm of the quotient

Logarithm of the quotient equal to the difference of logarithms:

log a (x / y) = log a x – log a y

Property 3. Logarithm of power

Logarithm of degree equal to the product of the power and the logarithm:

If the base of the logarithm is in the degree, then another formula applies:

Property 4. Logarithm of the root

This property can be obtained from the property of the logarithm of a power, since the nth root of the power is equal to the power of 1/n:

Formula for converting from a logarithm in one base to a logarithm in another base

This formula is also often used when solving various tasks on logarithms:

Special case:

Comparing logarithms (inequalities)

Let us have 2 functions f(x) and g(x) under logarithms with the same bases and between them there is an inequality sign:

To compare them, you need to first look at the base of the logarithms a:

  • If a > 0, then f(x) > g(x) > 0
  • If 0< a < 1, то 0 < f(x) < g(x)

How to solve problems with logarithms: examples

Problems with logarithms included in the Unified State Examination in mathematics for grade 11 in task 5 and task 7, you can find tasks with solutions on our website in the appropriate sections. Also, tasks with logarithms are found in the math task bank. You can find all examples by searching the site.

What is a logarithm

Logarithms have always been considered complex topic in a school mathematics course. There are many different definitions logarithm, but for some reason most textbooks use the most complex and unsuccessful of them.

We will define the logarithm simply and clearly. To do this, let's create a table:

So, we have powers of two.

Logarithms - properties, formulas, how to solve

If you take the number from the bottom line, you can easily find the power to which you will have to raise two to get this number. For example, to get 16, you need to raise two to the fourth power. And to get 64, you need to raise two to the sixth power. This can be seen from the table.

And now - actually, the definition of the logarithm:

the base a of the argument x is the power to which the number a must be raised to obtain the number x.

Designation: log a x = b, where a is the base, x is the argument, b is what the logarithm is actually equal to.

For example, 2 3 = 8 ⇒log 2 8 = 3 (the base 2 logarithm of 8 is three because 2 3 = 8). With the same success, log 2 64 = 6, since 2 6 = 64.

The operation of finding the logarithm of a number to a given base is called. So, let's add a new line to our table:

2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6
2 4 8 16 32 64
log 2 2 = 1 log 2 4 = 2 log 2 8 = 3 log 2 16 = 4 log 2 32 = 5 log 2 64 = 6

Unfortunately, not all logarithms are calculated so easily. For example, try to find log 2 5. The number 5 is not in the table, but logic dictates that the logarithm will lie somewhere on the interval. Because 2 2< 5 < 2 3 , а чем больше степень двойки, тем больше получится число.

Such numbers are called irrational: the numbers after the decimal point can be written ad infinitum, and they are never repeated. If the logarithm turns out to be irrational, it is better to leave it that way: log 2 5, log 3 8, log 5 100.

It is important to understand that a logarithm is an expression with two variables (the base and the argument). At first, many people confuse where the basis is and where the argument is. To avoid annoying misunderstandings, just look at the picture:

Before us is nothing more than the definition of a logarithm. Remember: logarithm is a power, into which the base must be built in order to obtain an argument. It is the base that is raised to a power - it is highlighted in red in the picture. It turns out that the base is always at the bottom! I tell my students this wonderful rule at the very first lesson - and no confusion arises.

How to count logarithms

We've figured out the definition - all that remains is to learn how to count logarithms, i.e. get rid of the "log" sign. To begin with, we note that two important facts follow from the definition:

  1. The argument and the base must always be greater than zero. This follows from the definition of a degree by a rational exponent, to which the definition of a logarithm is reduced.
  2. The base must be different from one, since one to any degree still remains one. Because of this, the question “to what power must one be raised to get two” is meaningless. There is no such degree!

Such restrictions are called region acceptable values (ODZ). It turns out that the ODZ of the logarithm looks like this: log a x = b ⇒x > 0, a > 0, a ≠ 1.

Note that there are no restrictions on the number b (the value of the logarithm). For example, the logarithm may well be negative: log 2 0.5 = −1, because 0.5 = 2 −1.

However, now we are considering only numerical expressions, where it is not required to know the VA of the logarithm. All restrictions have already been taken into account by the authors of the problems. But when logarithmic equations and inequalities come into play, DL requirements will become mandatory. After all, the basis and argument may contain very strong constructions that do not necessarily correspond to the above restrictions.

Now let's consider general scheme calculating logarithms. It consists of three steps:

  1. Express the base a and the argument x as a power with the minimum possible base greater than one. Along the way, it’s better to get rid of decimals;
  2. Solve the equation for variable b: x = a b ;
  3. The resulting number b will be the answer.

That's all! If the logarithm turns out to be irrational, this will be visible already in the first step. The requirement that the base be greater than one is very important: this reduces the likelihood of error and greatly simplifies the calculations. Same with decimals: if you immediately convert them to regular ones, there will be many fewer errors.

Let's see how this scheme works using specific examples:

Task. Calculate the logarithm: log 5 25

  1. Let's imagine the base and argument as a power of five: 5 = 5 1 ; 25 = 5 2 ;
  2. Let's create and solve the equation:
    log 5 25 = b ⇒(5 1) b = 5 2 ⇒5 b = 5 2 ⇒ b = 2;

  3. We received the answer: 2.

Task. Calculate the logarithm:

Task. Calculate the logarithm: log 4 64

  1. Let's imagine the base and argument as a power of two: 4 = 2 2 ; 64 = 2 6 ;
  2. Let's create and solve the equation:
    log 4 64 = b ⇒(2 2) b = 2 6 ⇒2 2b = 2 6 ⇒2b = 6 ⇒ b = 3;
  3. We received the answer: 3.

Task. Calculate the logarithm: log 16 1

  1. Let's imagine the base and argument as a power of two: 16 = 2 4 ; 1 = 2 0 ;
  2. Let's create and solve the equation:
    log 16 1 = b ⇒(2 4) b = 2 0 ⇒2 4b = 2 0 ⇒4b = 0 ⇒ b = 0;
  3. We received the answer: 0.

Task. Calculate the logarithm: log 7 14

  1. Let's imagine the base and argument as a power of seven: 7 = 7 1 ; 14 cannot be represented as a power of seven, since 7 1< 14 < 7 2 ;
  2. From the previous paragraph it follows that the logarithm does not count;
  3. The answer is no change: log 7 14.

A small note on the last example. How can you be sure that a number is not an exact power of another number? It’s very simple - just factor it into prime factors. If the expansion has at least two different factors, the number is not an exact power.

Task. Find out whether the numbers are exact powers: 8; 48; 81; 35; 14.

8 = 2 · 2 · 2 = 2 3 - exact degree, because there is only one multiplier;
48 = 6 · 8 = 3 · 2 · 2 · 2 · 2 = 3 · 2 4 - is not an exact power, since there are two factors: 3 and 2;
81 = 9 · 9 = 3 · 3 · 3 · 3 = 3 4 - exact degree;
35 = 7 · 5 - again not an exact power;
14 = 7 · 2 - again not an exact degree;

Note also that the prime numbers themselves are always exact powers of themselves.

Decimal logarithm

Some logarithms are so common that they have a special name and symbol.

of the argument x is the logarithm to base 10, i.e. The power to which the number 10 must be raised to obtain the number x. Designation: lg x.

For example, log 10 = 1; lg 100 = 2; lg 1000 = 3 - etc.

From now on, when a phrase like “Find lg 0.01” appears in a textbook, know that this is not a typo. This is a decimal logarithm. However, if you are unfamiliar with this notation, you can always rewrite it:
log x = log 10 x

Everything that is true for ordinary logarithms is also true for decimal logarithms.

Natural logarithm

There is another logarithm that has its own designation. In some ways, it's even more important than decimal. We are talking about the natural logarithm.

of the argument x is the logarithm to base e, i.e. the power to which the number e must be raised to obtain the number x. Designation: ln x.

Many people will ask: what is the number e? This irrational number, his exact value impossible to find and record. I will give only the first figures:
e = 2.718281828459…

We won’t go into detail about what this number is and why it is needed. Just remember that e is the base of the natural logarithm:
ln x = log e x

Thus ln e = 1; ln e 2 = 2; ln e 16 = 16 - etc. On the other hand, ln 2 is an irrational number. In general, the natural logarithm of any rational number is irrational. Except, of course, for one: ln 1 = 0.

For natural logarithms, all the rules that are true for ordinary logarithms are valid.

See also:

Logarithm. Properties of the logarithm (power of the logarithm).

How to represent a number as a logarithm?

We use the definition of logarithm.

A logarithm is an exponent to which the base must be raised to obtain the number under the logarithm sign.

Thus, in order to represent a certain number c as a logarithm to base a, you need to put a power with the same base as the base of the logarithm under the sign of the logarithm, and write this number c as the exponent:

Absolutely any number can be represented as a logarithm - positive, negative, integer, fractional, rational, irrational:

In order not to confuse a and c under stressful conditions of a test or exam, you can use the following memorization rule:

what is below goes down, what is above goes up.

For example, you need to represent the number 2 as a logarithm to base 3.

We have two numbers - 2 and 3. These numbers are the base and the exponent, which we will write under the sign of the logarithm. It remains to determine which of these numbers should be written down, to the base of the degree, and which – up, to the exponent.

The base 3 in the notation of a logarithm is at the bottom, which means that when we represent two as a logarithm to the base 3, we will also write 3 down to the base.

2 is higher than three. And in notation of the degree two we write above the three, that is, as an exponent:

Logarithms. First level.

Logarithms

Logarithm positive number b based on a, Where a > 0, a ≠ 1, is called the exponent to which the number must be raised a, To obtain b.

Definition of logarithm can be briefly written like this:

This equality is valid for b > 0, a > 0, a ≠ 1. It is usually called logarithmic identity.
The action of finding the logarithm of a number is called by logarithm.

Properties of logarithms:

Logarithm of the product:

Logarithm of the quotient:

Replacing the logarithm base:

Logarithm of degree:

Logarithm of the root:

Logarithm with power base:





Decimal and natural logarithms.

Decimal logarithm numbers call the logarithm of this number to base 10 and write   lg b
Natural logarithm numbers are called the logarithm of that number to the base e, Where e- an irrational number approximately equal to 2.7. At the same time they write ln b.

Other notes on algebra and geometry

Basic properties of logarithms

Basic properties of logarithms

Logarithms, like any numbers, can be added, subtracted and transformed in every way. But since logarithms are not exactly ordinary numbers, there are rules here, which are called main properties.

You definitely need to know these rules - without them, not a single serious logarithmic problem can be solved. In addition, there are very few of them - you can learn everything in one day. So let's get started.

Adding and subtracting logarithms

Consider two logarithms with the same bases: log a x and log a y. Then they can be added and subtracted, and:

  1. log a x + log a y = log a (x y);
  2. log a x − log a y = log a (x: y).

So, the sum of logarithms is equal to the logarithm of the product, and the difference is equal to the logarithm of the quotient. Please note: the key point here is identical grounds. If the reasons are different, these rules do not work!

These formulas will help you calculate a logarithmic expression even when its individual parts are not considered (see the lesson “What is a logarithm”). Take a look at the examples and see:

Log 6 4 + log 6 9.

Since logarithms have the same bases, we use the sum formula:
log 6 4 + log 6 9 = log 6 (4 9) = log 6 36 = 2.

Task. Find the value of the expression: log 2 48 − log 2 3.

The bases are the same, we use the difference formula:
log 2 48 − log 2 3 = log 2 (48: 3) = log 2 16 = 4.

Task. Find the value of the expression: log 3 135 − log 3 5.

Again the bases are the same, so we have:
log 3 135 − log 3 5 = log 3 (135: 5) = log 3 27 = 3.

As you can see, the original expressions are made up of “bad” logarithms, which are not calculated separately. But after the transformations they turn out quite normal numbers. Many are built on this fact test papers. Yes, test-like expressions are offered in all seriousness (sometimes with virtually no changes) on the Unified State Examination.

Extracting the exponent from the logarithm

Now let's complicate the task a little. What if the base or argument of a logarithm is a power? Then the exponent of this degree can be taken out of the sign of the logarithm according to the following rules:

It is easy to see that the last rule follows the first two. But it’s better to remember it anyway - in some cases it will significantly reduce the amount of calculations.

Of course, all these rules make sense if the ODZ of the logarithm is observed: a > 0, a ≠ 1, x > 0. And one more thing: learn to apply all formulas not only from left to right, but also vice versa, i.e. You can enter the numbers before the logarithm sign into the logarithm itself.

How to solve logarithms

This is what is most often required.

Task. Find the value of the expression: log 7 49 6 .

Let's get rid of the degree in the argument using the first formula:
log 7 49 6 = 6 log 7 49 = 6 2 = 12

Task. Find the meaning of the expression:

Note that the denominator contains a logarithm, the base and argument of which are exact powers: 16 = 2 4 ; 49 = 7 2. We have:

I think the last example requires some clarification. Where have logarithms gone? Until the very last moment we work only with the denominator. We presented the base and argument of the logarithm standing there in the form of powers and took out the exponents - we got a “three-story” fraction.

Now let's look at the main fraction. The numerator and denominator contain the same number: log 2 7. Since log 2 7 ≠ 0, we can reduce the fraction - 2/4 will remain in the denominator. According to the rules of arithmetic, the four can be transferred to the numerator, which is what was done. The result was the answer: 2.

Transition to a new foundation

Speaking about the rules for adding and subtracting logarithms, I specifically emphasized that they only work with the same bases. What if the reasons are different? What if they are not exact powers of the same number?

Formulas for transition to a new foundation come to the rescue. Let us formulate them in the form of a theorem:

Let the logarithm log a x be given. Then for any number c such that c > 0 and c ≠ 1, the equality is true:

In particular, if we set c = x, we get:

From the second formula it follows that the base and argument of the logarithm can be swapped, but in this case the entire expression is “turned over”, i.e. the logarithm appears in the denominator.

These formulas are rarely found in ordinary numerical expressions. It is possible to evaluate how convenient they are only when solving logarithmic equations and inequalities.

However, there are problems that cannot be solved at all except by moving to a new foundation. Let's look at a couple of these:

Task. Find the value of the expression: log 5 16 log 2 25.

Note that the arguments of both logarithms contain exact powers. Let's take out the indicators: log 5 16 = log 5 2 4 = 4log 5 2; log 2 25 = log 2 5 2 = 2log 2 5;

Now let’s “reverse” the second logarithm:

Since the product does not change when rearranging factors, we calmly multiplied four and two, and then dealt with logarithms.

Task. Find the value of the expression: log 9 100 lg 3.

The base and argument of the first logarithm are exact powers. Let's write this down and get rid of the indicators:

Now let's get rid of the decimal logarithm by moving to a new base:

Basic logarithmic identity

Often in the solution process it is necessary to represent a number as a logarithm to a given base.

In this case, the following formulas will help us:

In the first case, the number n becomes the exponent in the argument. The number n can be absolutely anything, because it is just a logarithm value.

The second formula is actually a paraphrased definition. That's what it's called: .

In fact, what happens if the number b is raised to such a power that the number b to this power gives the number a? That's right: the result is the same number a. Read this paragraph carefully again - many people get stuck on it.

Like formulas for moving to a new base, the basic logarithmic identity is sometimes the only possible solution.

Task. Find the meaning of the expression:

Note that log 25 64 = log 5 8 - simply took the square from the base and argument of the logarithm. Taking into account the rules for multiplying powers with the same base, we get:

If anyone doesn’t know, this was a real task from the Unified State Exam :)

Logarithmic unit and logarithmic zero

In conclusion, I will give two identities that can hardly be called properties - rather, they are consequences of the definition of the logarithm. They constantly appear in problems and, surprisingly, create problems even for “advanced” students.

  1. log a a = 1 is. Remember once and for all: the logarithm to any base a of that base itself is equal to one.
  2. log a 1 = 0 is. The base a can be anything, but if the argument contains one, the logarithm is equal to zero! Because a 0 = 1 is a direct consequence of the definition.

That's all the properties. Be sure to practice putting them into practice! Download the cheat sheet at the beginning of the lesson, print it out, and solve the problems.

    Let's start with properties of the logarithm of one. Its formulation is as follows: the logarithm of unity is equal to zero, that is, log a 1=0 for any a>0, a≠1. The proof is not difficult: since a 0 =1 for any a satisfying the above conditions a>0 and a≠1, then the equality log a 1=0 to be proved follows immediately from the definition of the logarithm.

    Let us give examples of the application of the considered property: log 3 1=0, log1=0 and .

    Let's move on to to the following property: the logarithm of a number equal to the base is equal to one, that is, log a a=1 for a>0, a≠1. Indeed, since a 1 =a for any a, then by definition of the logarithm log a a=1.

    Examples of using this property of logarithms are the equalities log 5 5=1, log 5.6 5.6 and lne=1.

    For example, log 2 2 7 =7, log10 -4 =-4 and .

    Logarithm of the product of two positive numbers x and y is equal to the product of the logarithms of these numbers: log a (x y)=log a x+log a y, a>0 , a≠1 . Let us prove the property of the logarithm of a product. Due to the properties of the degree a log a x+log a y =a log a x ·a log a y, and since by the main logarithmic identity a log a x =x and a log a y =y, then a log a x ·a log a y =x·y. Thus, a log a x+log a y =x·y, from which, by the definition of a logarithm, the equality being proved follows.

    Let's show examples of using the property of the logarithm of a product: log 5 (2 3)=log 5 2+log 5 3 and .

    The property of the logarithm of a product can be generalized to the product of a finite number n of positive numbers x 1 , x 2 , …, x n as log a (x 1 ·x 2 ·…·x n)= log a x 1 +log a x 2 +…+log a x n . This equality can be proven without problems.

    For example, the natural logarithm of the product can be replaced by the sum of three natural logarithms of the numbers 4, e, and.

    Logarithm of the quotient of two positive numbers x and y is equal to the difference between the logarithms of these numbers. The property of the logarithm of a quotient corresponds to a formula of the form , where a>0, a≠1, x and y are some positive numbers. The validity of this formula is proven as well as the formula for the logarithm of a product: since , then by definition of a logarithm.

    Here is an example of using this property of the logarithm: .

    Let's move on to property of the logarithm of the power. The logarithm of a degree is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the modulus of the base of this degree. Let us write this property of the logarithm of a power as a formula: log a b p =p·log a |b|, where a>0, a≠1, b and p are numbers such that the degree b p makes sense and b p >0.

    First we prove this property for positive b. The basic logarithmic identity allows us to represent the number b as a log a b , then b p =(a log a b) p , and the resulting expression, due to the property of power, is equal to a p·log a b . So we come to the equality b p =a p·log a b, from which, by the definition of a logarithm, we conclude that log a b p =p·log a b.

    It remains to prove this property for negative b. Here we note that the expression log a b p for negative b makes sense only for even exponents p (since the value of the degree b p must be greater than zero, otherwise the logarithm will not make sense), and in this case b p =|b| p. Then b p =|b| p =(a log a |b|) p =a p·log a |b|, from where log a b p =p·log a |b| .

    For example, and ln(-3) 4 =4·ln|-3|=4·ln3 .

    It follows from the previous property property of the logarithm from the root: the logarithm of the nth root is equal to the product of the fraction 1/n by the logarithm of the radical expression, that is, , where a>0, a≠1, n is a natural number greater than one, b>0.

    The proof is based on the equality (see), which is valid for any positive b, and the property of the logarithm of the power: .

    Here is an example of using this property: .

    Now let's prove formula for moving to a new logarithm base kind . To do this, it is enough to prove the validity of the equality log c b=log a b·log c a. The basic logarithmic identity allows us to represent the number b as a log a b , then log c b=log c a log a b . It remains to use the property of the logarithm of the degree: log c a log a b =log a b log c a. This proves the equality log c b=log a b·log c a, which means that the formula for transition to a new base of the logarithm has also been proven.

    Let's show a couple of examples of using this property of logarithms: and .

    The formula for moving to a new base allows you to move on to working with logarithms that have a “convenient” base. For example, it can be used to go to natural or decimal logarithms so that you can calculate the value of a logarithm from a table of logarithms. The formula for moving to a new logarithm base also allows, in some cases, to find the value of a given logarithm when the values ​​of some logarithms with other bases are known.

    Used frequently special case formulas for transition to a new base of the logarithm with c=b of the form . This shows that log a b and log b a – . Eg, .

    The formula is also often used , which is convenient for finding logarithm values. To confirm our words, we will show how it can be used to calculate the value of a logarithm of the form . We have . To prove the formula it is enough to use the formula for transition to a new base of the logarithm a: .

    It remains to prove the properties of comparison of logarithms.

    Let us prove that for any positive numbers b 1 and b 2, b 1 log a b 2 , and for a>1 – the inequality log a b 1

    Finally, it remains to prove the last of the listed properties of logarithms. Let us limit ourselves to the proof of its first part, that is, we will prove that if a 1 >1, a 2 >1 and a 1 1 is true log a 1 b>log a 2 b . The remaining statements of this property of logarithms are proved according to a similar principle.

    Let's use the opposite method. Suppose that for a 1 >1, a 2 >1 and a 1 1 is true log a 1 b≤log a 2 b . Based on the properties of logarithms, these inequalities can be rewritten as And respectively, and from them it follows that log b a 1 ≤log b a 2 and log b a 1 ≥log b a 2, respectively. Then, according to the properties of powers with the same bases, the equalities b log b a 1 ≥b log b a 2 and b log b a 1 ≥b log b a 2 must hold, that is, a 1 ≥a 2 . So we came to a contradiction to the condition a 1

Bibliography.

  • Kolmogorov A.N., Abramov A.M., Dudnitsyn Yu.P. and others. Algebra and the beginnings of analysis: Textbook for grades 10 - 11 of general education institutions.
  • Gusev V.A., Mordkovich A.G. Mathematics (a manual for those entering technical schools).

Instructions

Write the given logarithmic expression. If the expression uses the logarithm of 10, then its notation is shortened and looks like this: lg b is the decimal logarithm. If the logarithm has the number e as its base, then write the expression: ln b – natural logarithm. It is understood that the result of any is the power to which the base number must be raised to obtain the number b.

When finding the sum of two functions, you simply need to differentiate them one by one and add the results: (u+v)" = u"+v";

When finding the derivative of the product of two functions, it is necessary to multiply the derivative of the first function by the second and add the derivative of the second function multiplied by the first function: (u*v)" = u"*v+v"*u;

In order to find the derivative of the quotient of two functions, it is necessary to subtract from the product of the derivative of the dividend multiplied by the divisor function the product of the derivative of the divisor multiplied by the function of the dividend, and divide all this by the divisor function squared. (u/v)" = (u"*v-v"*u)/v^2;

If a complex function is given, then it is necessary to multiply the derivative of the internal function and the derivative of the external one. Let y=u(v(x)), then y"(x)=y"(u)*v"(x).

Using the results obtained above, you can differentiate almost any function. So let's look at a few examples:

y=x^4, y"=4*x^(4-1)=4*x^3;

y=2*x^3*(e^x-x^2+6), y"=2*(3*x^2*(e^x-x^2+6)+x^3*(e^x-2 *x));
There are also problems involving calculating the derivative at a point. Let the function y=e^(x^2+6x+5) be given, you need to find the value of the function at the point x=1.
1) Find the derivative of the function: y"=e^(x^2-6x+5)*(2*x +6).

2) Calculate the value of the function at a given point y"(1)=8*e^0=8

Video on the topic

Helpful advice

Learn the table of elementary derivatives. This will significantly save time.

Sources:

  • derivative of a constant

So, what is the difference between an irrational equation and a rational one? If the unknown variable is under the square root sign, then the equation is considered irrational.

Instructions

The main method for solving such equations is the method of constructing both sides equations into a square. However. this is natural, the first thing you need to do is get rid of the sign. This method is not technically difficult, but sometimes it can lead to trouble. For example, the equation is v(2x-5)=v(4x-7). By squaring both sides you get 2x-5=4x-7. Solving such an equation is not difficult; x=1. But the number 1 will not be given equations. Why? Substitute one into the equation instead of the value of x. And the right and left sides will contain expressions that do not make sense, that is. This value is not valid for a square root. Therefore, 1 is an extraneous root, and therefore this equation has no roots.

So, an irrational equation is solved using the method of squaring both its sides. And having solved the equation, it is necessary to cut off extraneous roots. To do this, substitute the found roots into the original equation.

Consider another one.
2х+vх-3=0
Of course, this equation can be solved using the same equation as the previous one. Move Compounds equations, which do not have a square root, to the right side and then use the squaring method. solve the resulting rational equation and roots. But also another, more elegant one. Enter a new variable; vх=y. Accordingly, you will receive an equation of the form 2y2+y-3=0. That is, an ordinary quadratic equation. Find its roots; y1=1 and y2=-3/2. Next, solve two equations vх=1; vх=-3/2. The second equation has no roots; from the first we find that x=1. Don't forget to check the roots.

Solving identities is quite simple. To do this, it is necessary to carry out identical transformations until the set goal is achieved. Thus, with the help of simple arithmetic operations, the problem posed will be solved.

You will need

  • - paper;
  • - pen.

Instructions

The simplest of such transformations are algebraic abbreviated multiplications (such as the square of the sum (difference), difference of squares, sum (difference), cube of the sum (difference)). In addition, there are many trigonometric formulas, which are essentially the same identities.

Indeed, the square of the sum of two terms is equal to the square of the first plus twice the product of the first by the second and plus the square of the second, that is, (a+b)^2= (a+b)(a+b)=a^2+ab +ba+b ^2=a^2+2ab+b^2.

Simplify both

General principles of the solution

Repeat from a textbook on mathematical analysis or higher mathematics what a definite integral is. As is known, the solution to a definite integral is a function whose derivative will give an integrand. This function is called antiderivative. Based on this principle, the main integrals are constructed.
Determine by the type of the integrand which of the table integrals is suitable in this case. It is not always possible to determine this immediately. Often, the tabular form becomes noticeable only after several transformations to simplify the integrand.

Variable Replacement Method

If the integrand is a trigonometric function whose argument is a polynomial, then try using the change of variables method. In order to do this, replace the polynomial in the argument of the integrand with some new variable. Based on the relationship between the new and old variables, determine the new limits of integration. By differentiating this expression, find the new differential in . Thus, you will get a new form of the previous integral, close or even corresponding to some tabular one.

Solving integrals of the second kind

If the integral is an integral of the second kind, a vector form of the integrand, then you will need to use the rules for the transition from these integrals to scalar ones. One such rule is the Ostrogradsky-Gauss relation. This law allows us to move from the rotor flux of a certain vector function to the triple integral over the divergence of a given vector field.

Substitution of integration limits

After finding the antiderivative, it is necessary to substitute the limits of integration. First, substitute the value of the upper limit into the expression for the antiderivative. You will get some number. Next, subtract from the resulting number another number obtained from the lower limit into the antiderivative. If one of the limits of integration is infinity, then when substituting it into the antiderivative function, it is necessary to go to the limit and find what the expression tends to.
If the integral is two-dimensional or three-dimensional, then you will have to represent the limits of integration geometrically to understand how to evaluate the integral. Indeed, in the case of, say, a three-dimensional integral, the limits of integration can be entire planes that limit the volume being integrated.
Loading...Loading...