It was reported that the world-famous and credible Smithsonian Institution was accused in a lawsuit of hiding information and evidence about the giant people whose remains were found during excavations.
Some of their skulls may have had horns, others have double rows of teeth! Some supposedly had six fingers and elongated heads and carried giant weapons. The US Supreme Court ruling forced the world's largest museum to publish classified documents from the archives of the early 19th century about these strange artifacts.
It was also said that there is evidence - thousands of giant skeletons between 183 and 366 centimeters (6-12 feet) have been excavated throughout the United States. Indeed, the old newspapers have a surprising number of reports of giant skeletons. However, there is healthy skepticism about these messages.
Human skulls with horns 
Several eerie horned human skulls and 213 cm (7 ") skeletons have been reported.
Human remains were allegedly excavated from an ancient burial mound near Sayre, Pennsylvania in the 1880s.
The horns were about 5 centimeters (2 inches) long, pointed and extended above the eyebrows. The excavations were believed to have been carried out by a trusted group of researchers, including Dr. GP Donehoo, who was the Pennsylvania State Historian, and two professors, AB Skinner and WK Morehead.
These remains are believed to date back to around 1200 AD. They ended up in Philadelphia, at the American Investigation Museum, but apparently stolen and not presented to the general public.
There have been claims of horned human turtles excavated in Texas and New York.
The mysterious hills of Iowa 
Archaeologists came across some very strange things when they began excavating Native American mounds around Iowa. An 1897 newspaper article writes in an official report that scientists dug up the bones of a giant human skeleton, 229 cm in size.
Unfortunately, the bones crumbled to dust in the air, but the team found many artifacts next to the remains. These artifacts indicate that the person had a high status.
In another hill in Iowa, archaeologists allegedly found a large chamber in which they found 11 skeletons, all kneeling with their backs to the walls around a giant shell from which they drank. Mass suicide, perhaps? Also found a curious copper-colored fetid dust. It was the dust of cremated remains.
Giant of the Ozarks 
In 1933, near Stahlville, Missouri, a small resort town in the Ozarsk, a local 16-year-old boy named Billy Harman discovered human remains in a pit (Puckett's Cave near the Meramek River). He was frightened by the sight of human bones and fled. But later he announced his find. Archaeologists have dug up a giant human skeleton there, 244 centimeters long.
Prior to this, on January 21, 1899, the Miamisburg Daily Telegraph reported on a huge human skeleton found in Ohio.
Scientists estimated that the man was just over 244 cm (8 ft). The strange remains were excavated by Edward Kaufman and Edward Gebhart about 0.8 km (0.5 mi) from Miamisburg in an area known to contain artifacts from early Indian mounds that lived in the area millennia ago.
What seemed to really baffle the archaeologists was that the bones were fossilized, indicating a very extreme (prehistoric) age. Another confusing issue was the physical appearance of the creature, which was said to be proportional to humans, but had a skull similar to that of a gorilla.
Giant San Diego 
On October 7, 1895, the Mir newspaper reported that "the largest giant ever known" was dug up near San Diego. A newspaper article described the discovery of a 274-centimeter mummified Native American and claimed that the find was attested by scientists - Professor Thomas Wilson (curator of the prehistoric anthropology department of the Smithsonian Institution) and others.
There was no carbon-14 dating method at the time, so they had to use local records that had been around for about 250 years. Scientists were perplexed by the fact that the archives did not mention people with this type of gigantism. (Of course, the Native American legend was not credited or reported in the newspapers.) The mummy was considered prehistoric and had the remains of some sort of hood on its head. They also determined that the creature was very old when it died.
Catalina Island skeletons 
Between 1919 and 1928, an amateur archaeologist named Ralph Glidd is said to have excavated over 800 ancient burial sites in about 100 different locations, all on Catalina Island. He allegedly discovered many thousands of artifacts and nearly 4,000 human skeletons. According to him, the average height of male skeletons is 213 cm (7 feet), and the tallest is over 274 centimeters (9 feet).
Most people think that he was just mocking people to make money, but it is not known for sure.
Mystery in Wisconsin 
On May 4, 1912, the New York Times reported the discovery of 18 giant skeletons in southwestern Wisconsin. Human remains were excavated by the Peterson brothers, near Lake Delavan, with "several strange and bizarre features." Ranging from 231 to 305 centimeters (7 "7" -10 "), with huge elongated skulls larger than any other North American race known at the time.
Many skulls had double rows of teeth.
Another New York Times article, dated August 10, 1891, reported the discovery by the Smithsonian Institution of pyramidal monuments on Mills Lake, near Madison, Wisconsin. According to scholars of the time, Madison was once a huge community (which they christened "Fort Azalan") with at least 200,000 inhabitants.
Another skeleton with two rows of teeth 
In 1833, a 366-centimeter (12 ft) human skeleton was allegedly discovered by accident by soldiers digging an ammunition dump near Lompoc Rancho, California. The skull had a double row of teeth and was surrounded by artifacts of high status. There were also porphyry blocks with strange markings and patterns on them, which also puzzled scientists back then.
There is not much documentation on this unusual find, which is also not surprising given the implications for mainstream science.
Giant skeleton found in Australia
Believe it or not, it was reported in 2015 that the largest human skeleton ever found was found near Ayers Rock (the most mysterious and most sacred aboriginal site) in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park in Australia. A team of archaeologists from the University of Adelaide allegedly unearthed a skeleton that was a whopping 528 centimeters (17 "4")! Professor Hans Zimmer of the University of Adelaide was forced to admit: “The discoveries at Uluru took us by surprise. In theory, a 5 meter tall hominid cannot exist. ”Is this really true? If so, how could such a giant be possible? The alleged giant human specimen was found near the only known megalithic ruins in Australia, further surprising scientists.
The largest and strangest human skeleton 
The 1870 Oil City Times reported the discovery in West Hickory, Pennsylvania, of not only the largest human skeleton ever discovered, but also the strangest. The creature they unearthed was estimated to be an incredible 549 cm (18 ft) tall! Even stranger, they reportedly found a huge rusty iron helmet and a giant sword 2.8 meters (9 feet) long. They also reported that the skeleton was in excellent condition and very white, and that the teeth were all there and in place in the huge skull in two rows. Interestingly, the bones are said to have been excavated at a depth of 3.7 meters (12 feet), which makes sense. It would be logical to think that a body of this size would need to be buried much deeper than 1.8 meters (6 feet). , right?
In the legends and legends of almost all the peoples of the Earth, there are references to people of enormous stature - giants. The fact that people used to live on Earth, whose growth was much higher than that of modern humans, is indicated by many archaeological finds found around the world.
The remains of giant people have been found in almost every part of the world:Mexico, Peru, Tunisia, Pennsylvania, Texas, Philippines, Syria, Morocco, Australia, Spain, Georgia, Southeast Asia, the islands of Oceania.
In 2008, near the city Borjomi, v Kharagaulsky reserve, a skeleton was found by Georgian archaeologists three-meter giant... Found skull in 3 times more the skull of an ordinary person.
The remains of giant people were found in Australia where anthropologists found a petrified indigenous tooth 67 mm high and 42 mm wide... The owner of the tooth must have been about 7.5 meters and weight 370 kilograms... Hydrocarbon analysis determined the age of the find - 9 million years.
V China found fragments of the jaws of people whose height was from 3 before 3,5 meters, and weight 300 kilograms.
V South Africa, at diamond mines, a fragment of a huge skull with a height 45 centimeters... Anthropologists have determined the age of the skull - about 9 million years.
Many remains of giants were found in the last century on Caucasus... In 2000, in a mountain cave in Eastern Georgia, archaeologists discovered the skeletons of four-meter giants.
In 2001, on July 23, by Marvin Rainwater, the owner of a farm in Iowa (USA), while digging a well, a tomb with mummified giant people 3 meters in height was discovered.
V Sahara near Gobero burials of the Stone Age were discovered. The age of the remains is about 5000 years. In 2005-2006, about 200 burials of two cultures were found in the region - Kythian and tenerian... The Kythians lived in this territory 8 - 10 thousand years back. They were distinguished by high growth, exceeding 2 meters.
Many giant fossil bones have been discovered in one of the mountain valleys Turkey... The fossilized bone of a human leg has a length 120 centimeters, judging by this size, the height of the person was about 5 meters. The Race of Giants existed!
The end of the twentieth century was marked by a sensational find by an Anglo-French paleontological expedition, which conducted research in remote parts of southern Mongolia, in the Gobi Desert, which has long been considered a collection of secrets. There is a place called Uulakh, about which the legend of a giant devil who lived in a stone gorge is passed down from generation to generation. It was so huge that the ground could hardly carry it.
A group of paleontologists, led by Professor Higley, decided to test the veracity of this legend. Persistent excavations in rock strata, whose age is about 45 million years, were crowned with success: a well-preserved skeleton of a humanoid creature was discovered. Moreover, scientists were struck by his growth - about 15-17 meters. So the legend was true? But how did the locals learn about the "gigantic shaitan" if he lived millions of years ago? There is only one plausible explanation: they have already seen his bones. The rock could be washed out by water, which allowed the Mongols to see the remains, the legend of which has been passed down from generation to generation for hundreds of years.
This means that human civilization has already existed for 45 million years - the Race of Giants !?
Independent experts pointed out another important factor: a fake of this magnitude cannot be secretly manufactured and delivered to the required location.
Noteworthy is the version put forward by the Canadian scientist Roger Wingley, who noted that it is necessary to take into account the data of recent studies. It follows from them that for billions of years the Earth revolved around the Sun and around its axis much faster than at the present time. Calculations show that at that time the day lasted about 10 hours, and in one year there were almost 400 days. According to Wingley, such conditions made it possible for the existence of giants - dinosaurs, lizards, and even humanoid. It is likely that this is the answer to the mysterious gorge.
In a number of British newspapers, articles appeared that called for a new look at the history of human development. The famous British scientist Dr. Townes expressed his view on the problem.
He believes that his colleagues have made a unique find that does not belong to earthly civilization. The professor put forward a hypothesis that the creature found in the Gobi Desert developed and lived according to laws that are very far from earthly evolution. Therefore, this is not a representative of an extinct race from our planet, not a hoax, but a creature from outer space.
Historical chronicles of the 19th century often report the finds in different parts of the world of skeletons of people of abnormally tall stature.
In 1821 in USA in Tennessee found the ruins of an ancient stone wall, and under it two human skeletons 215 centimeters high. In Wisconsin, during the construction of a granary in 1879, huge vertebrae and skull bones were found "of incredible thickness and size," according to a newspaper article.
In 1883 in Utah several burial mounds were discovered, in which there were burials of people very tall - 195 centimeters, which is at least 30 centimeters higher than the average height of the Aboriginal Indians. The latter did not make these burials and could not provide any information about them. In 1885, in Gasterville (Pennsylvania), a stone crypt was discovered in a large burial mound, in which there was a skeleton 215 centimeters high. Primitive images of people, birds and animals were carved on the walls of the crypt.
In 1890 in Egypt archaeologists have found a stone sarcophagus with a clay coffin inside, which contained the mummies of a two-meter red-haired woman and a baby. The facial features and constitution of the mummy were sharply different from the ancient Egyptians. Similar mummies of a man and a woman with red hair were discovered in 1912 in Lovlock (Nevada) in a cave carved into the rock. The height of a mummified woman during her lifetime was two meters, and a man's was about three meters.
In 1930, near Basarsta in Australia prospectors at jasper mines often found fossilized prints of huge human feet. Anthropologists called the race of giant people, the remains of which were found in Australia, megantropuses.The height of these people ranged from 210 to 365 centimeters. Meganthropuses are similar to giantopi-tecs, the remains of which were found in China Judging by the fragments of jaws and many teeth found, the height of the Chinese giants was 3 to 3.5 meters, and the weight was 400 kilograms.Near Basarst, in the river sediments there were stone artifacts of enormous weight and size - clubs plows, chisels, knives and axes. Modern Homo sapiens would hardly be able to work with instruments weighing from 4 to 9 kilograms.
An anthropological expedition, which specially investigated the area in 1985 for the presence of the remains of meganthropuses, carried out excavations at a depth of three meters from the surface of the earth. Australian researchers found, among other things, a fossilized molar, 67 mm high and 42 mm wide. The owner of the tooth had to be at least 7.5 meters tall and weigh 370 kilograms! Hydrocarbon analysis determined the age of the finds to be nine million years.
In 1971 in Queensland farmer Stephen Walker, plowing his field, came across a large fragment of a jaw with teeth, five centimeters high. In 1979 in Megalong Valley In the Blue Mountains, local residents found a huge stone sticking out above the surface of the stream, on which one could see the imprint of a part of a huge foot with five toes. The transverse size of the fingers was 17 centimeters. If the print had survived completely, it would have been 60 centimeters long. It follows that the imprint was left by a man six meters tall.
Close Malgoa three huge footprints were found 60 centimeters long, 17 - wide. The giant's stride length was measured at 130 centimeters. Traces have been preserved in the petrified lava for millions of years, even before Homo sapiens appeared on the Australian continent (assuming the theory of evolution is correct). Huge footprints are also found in the limestone bed of the Upper Maclay River. The fingerprints of these footprints are 10 centimeters long and the foot is 25 centimeters wide. Obviously, the aborigines of Australia were not the first inhabitants of the continent. It is interesting that in their folklore there are legends about the giant people who once lived in these territories. .
In one of the old books, entitled "History and Antiquity", now kept in the library of the University of Oxford, there is an account of the discovery of a giant skeleton, made in the Middle Ages in Cumberland. “The giant is buried four yards in the ground and is in full military dress. His sword and battle-ax rest beside him. The skeleton is 4.5 yards (4 meters) long and the big man's teeth measure 6.5 inches (17 centimeters). "
In 1877, not far from Jews in Nevada the prospectors worked on the gold panning in a desolate hilly area. One of the workers accidentally noticed something sticking out over the cliff ledge. People climbed the rock and were surprised to find the human bones of the foot and lower leg along with the patella. The bone was walled up in the rock, and the prospectors freed it from the rock with pickaxes. Assessing the uncommonness of the find, the workers brought it to Yevrek. The stone, into which the rest of the leg was embedded, was quartzite, and the bones themselves turned black, which betrayed their considerable age. The leg was broken above the knee and represented the knee joint and the intact bones of the leg and foot. Several doctors examined the bones and concluded that the leg was clearly human. But the most intriguing aspect of the find was its foot size - 97 centimeters from knee to foot The owner of this limb during his lifetime had a height 3 meters 60 centimeters.
Even more mysterious was the age of quartzite, in which the fossil was found - 185 million years, the era of the dinosaurs. Local newspapers vied with each other to report the sensation. One of the museums sent researchers to the find in the hope of finding the rest of the skeleton. Unfortunately, nothing else was found.
In 1936, German paleontologist and anthropologist Larson Kohl found the skeletons of giant humans on the shore Elysee Lake in Central Africa... 12 men buried in a mass grave had a height of 350 to 375 centimeters during their lifetime. Curiously, their skulls had sloping chins and two rows of upper and lower teeth.
There is evidence that during the Second World War on the territory Poland During the burial of the executed, a fossilized skull 55 centimeters high was found, that is, almost three times more than that of a modern adult. The giant who owned the skull had very proportional features and was at least 3.5 meters tall.
One of the most unique pieces of Klaus Don's collection is the bones of a giant. This is a genuine artifact. V Ecuador in 1964 he found part of the calcaneus and occipital bones of a human skeleton. Based on the calculations, he found out that this bone belonged to a person 7 meters 60 centimeters high. The age of these remains is more than 10 thousand years. But that is not all. V Bolivia he was also able to make a discovery. Klaus discovered a burial of people with a height of 260-280 centimeters. But the strangest thing is that they have extraordinary elongated skulls.
About giant people from other sources:
Helena Blavatsky
Theosophist, writer and traveler Helena Blavatsky formed a classification of existing earthly civilizations - the Indigenous Human Races:
Race I - angelic people,
Race II - ghost-like people,
Race III - Lemurians,
IV race - Atlanteans,
Race V - Aryans (WE).
In The Secret Doctrine, Helena Blavatsky writes that the inhabitants of Lemuria were the "root race" of humanity.
As Blavatsky writes, “the late Lemurians were 10 to 20 meters tall. All major achievements of earthly technologies come from them. They left their knowledge on the "golden plates" hidden to this day in hiding places. The Lemurian civilization existed for many millions of years and disappeared 2 - 3 million years ago.
The Atlantean race was also a highly developed race, but to a lesser extent than the Lemurians. Atlanteans were 5 - 6 meters tall, outwardly they were similar to modern people. Most of the Atlanteans died during the Flood 850 thousand years ago, but some groups of Atlanteans survived to a period of 12 thousand years ago.
The Aryan race appeared in the bowels of the Atlantic civilization about a million years ago. All modern earthlings are called Aryans. The early Aryans were 3-4 meters tall, then the height decreased. "
Nicholas Roerich
Scientist, artist, mystic philosopher Nicholas Roerich wrote about the Bamian statues: “These five figures belong to the creation of the hands of Initiates of the Fourth Race, who, after the sinking of their mainland, found refuge in strongholds and on the peaks of the Central Asian mountain range. These figures are an illustration of the Teaching about the gradual evolution of Races. The largest depicts the First Race, its etheric body imprinted in solid, indestructible stone. The second - at 36 meters in height - depicts "Sweat-born". The third - at 18 meters - perpetuates the Race, the fallen and conceived the first physical Race, born of a father and mother, the last offspring of which is depicted in statues on Easter Island. These were only 6 and 7.5 meters tall at the time when Lemuria was flooded. The Fourth Race was even smaller in size, albeit gigantic in comparison with our Fifth Race, and the series ends with the last. "
Drunvalo Melchizedek
Scholar and esotericist, Drunvalo Melchizedek in the book "The Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life" writes about aliens from parallel worlds on the land of Ancient Egypt.
He describes the growth of people of different spatial dimensions:
1.5 - 2 meters - the height of people of the third (our) dimension,
3.6 - 4.5 meters - fourth dimension,
10.6 meters - fifth dimension,
18 meters - the sixth dimension,
26 - 28 meters - seventh dimension.
Drunvalo Melchizedek writes that the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten was not an earthling, he came from the Sirius star system, his height was 4.5 meters. Akhenaten's wife, Nefertiti, was about 3.5 meters tall. They were people of the fourth dimension.
Ernst Muldashev
Professor Ernst Muldashev, during an expedition to Syria, in the town of Ain Dara, in an ancient ruined temple, discovered traces of a giant man. The length of the giant's footprint was 90 cm, the width at the base of the fingers was 45 cm, the length of the thumb was 20 cm, and the length of the little finger was 15 cm. According to calculations, a person with such foot sizes should have been 6.5-10 meters tall.
In the East, there is a very detailed description of the Buddha. From this description, called "60 features and 32 characteristics of the Buddha," it is known that the Buddha had an enormous height, membranes between the fingers and toes, 40 teeth, which corresponds to the description of the people of the Atlantean civilization.
GIANTS TODAY
At the present time, there are also giants, but, unfortunately, there is little fabulous in them. These are sick people suffering from increased function of the anterior pituitary gland, which produces growth hormone. Giants grow over 2 meters (the tallest person described in the literature was 320 centimeters tall). In childhood, they look like ordinary people, but by the beginning of puberty (9-10 years), their growth dramatically accelerates and lasts longer than in ordinary people.
Matryn Van Buren Bates(1837-1919) - "giant from Kentucky", the hero of the American Civil War, who fought on the side of the Confederation (slave south of the country). His height reached 243 centimeters, and his weight was 234 kilograms. In his youth, Martin worked as a school teacher, but after the outbreak of the civil war he went into the army, rose to the rank of captain, became a legend among the northerners, was captured, was exchanged (according to another version, he fled), and in the end decided to leave the service, hired to work in the circus.Despite the gigantic growth, such people are distinguished by poor health. They rarely live to old age, sometimes have mental problems, are not sexually active, and suffer from visual impairment. Their gigantism is disproportionate - people often become freaks with an overly small head and long limbs. However, despite this, many giants find the strength to live a normal life. They even manage to become famous.
Did a population of giant people live on Earth and where is it preserved? Where did the giant skull found in the Kremlin disappear to?
Paleoanthropologist Alexander Belov says that giants on the planet today are not uncommon. But where did they come from? Why are the amazing archaeological finds ignored: the mummies of giants in Texas, the bones of giant people in Ecuador, 2.40 - 2.45 cm tall, the burial of giants in the pyramids? Why are scientists faced with these findings already talking about the population, and not about the gigantism caused by the disruption of the pituitary gland? Did the Portuguese meet giant Indians when they conquered America? Where is the 3.5 meter stump of human bone stored? Could this bone be 10 million years old? Does another unique find, a boscopic skull weighing about 2 kg, prove the existence of a population of giant people? Where do you find huge human teeth that are believed to be dragon teeth? Could gigantopithecus reach 5 meters in height and weigh half a ton? Where did the giant skull found in the Kremlin disappear to? Why are the remains so poorly preserved in our forest-steppe territory, in contrast to the African Rift Plain? Where are the giant populations preserved on the planet today?
Belov Alexander: In Ecuador, quite recently, anthropologists have discovered the bones of giant people, there is a whole population. At least 5 skeletons are known to be quite complete, this is 2.40-2.45 somewhere. This, of course, is not God only knows what, but this is a population, that is, this is not pituitary gigantism, when a developmental anomaly, a person grows up, because he has hormones of somatotropin, it causes increased growth of the bones of the face, feet, and so on. This is a population, this is very important, that is, this is a group that reproduces, their gigantism is fixed at the genetic level. In principle, they began to study this as a phenomenon, they immediately recalled the findings of 1913 in Lovelock, there, if I’m not mistaken, Texas, mummies of giant people were also found there, archaeologists did this, but since there were mummies, in general, some of these The finds were damaged and taken away by local residents, while the archaeologists got there, 4 skulls remained, in the Lovelock Museum they are in storerooms. These are such skulls, they are much larger than modern skulls, there are Americanoids, of course, but, nevertheless, they are 30 centimeters high, these skulls. And in fact, we also have a population.
There is also information about tombs, about different burials, giants are found in the pyramids, 2.40-2.50 like this. That is, that there are documentary such engravings, when the Portuguese conquered America, they just met these giant Indians of some kind, they were a meter taller than them, at least. And the engravings have survived, just of this level. It was in Patagonia, there are just such engravings at that time in the 16th century. And there are some skeletons, bones, some ribs in museums, or rather, giant ones were kept in Inca temples. That is, in America it is, in general, apparently necessary to say that there was simply a population of giant people. How it happened is also a big question, either they became giants for the second time, or initially. That people can become giants is undoubtedly a fact. Maybe they lead some kind of their own population, their kind from the giants. For example, a bone has survived, a femur found near Johannesburg, it is in the hands of anthropologists, this is Francis Thackeray, such a researcher, he is the director of the Institute of Evolutionary Morphology and the President of the South African Paleontological Society, and he actually keeps this bone in this anatomical school in Johannesburg, and he shows it. There is a fifteen-minute video, you can watch it in English, you can watch this bone, it is chopped off, somewhere like this, this bone is chopped off, he is a morphologist himself, he explains well, very clearly that it is really giant, it is big, about 3-4 times more than a similar stump of modern bone from modern humans. In fact, he was 3.5 meters, 3.6 meters, and so according to his data, he is just a morphologist. I contacted him, asked him to make a 3D reconstruction of this bone, but he sent me to other people. In general, there is also noticeable pressure on him, despite the fact that he is the director of the institute and the president of the Paleontological Society, such things are simply not forgiven. I still think how he dared to do such a thing at all. This bone was found in the sixties in the Anadian mine by geologists, and by geological age, it is a petrified bone, that is, this already speaks of a rather big age, at least more than 2 million, and by the age of geological rocks, it dates from somewhere 10 million years. And you yourself understand, the human bone of a giant is 10 million years old, and here we cannot figure out the African ones with Australopithecines, but of course they deny it all, completely deny it, which means there was some kind of population. There is also a boscopic type, the so-called boscopic giants, there are several skulls left, it is believed that they were the predecessors of the Bushmen, but this age is about thirty, ten thousand years, the boscopic skull of a boscope is kept in the Darwin Museum, but it has more than 2 kilograms. large cranium, very large, with developed frontal, parietal lobes of the brain. But the modern Bushmen who live there, they have there 2 times less of all this.
To say that there was no population of giants is, of course, a bluff, they just try not to say it. The famous Dutch paleontologist Koenigswald, he studied, he found several teeth in a Hong Kong pharmacy, bought, and these were human teeth, they were 6 times larger, that is, molars are 6 times larger than human teeth, with roots, everything, that is, human enamel. He began to study, the remains were discovered, they identified this type together with another scientist Vandenreich, he was named "Black's gigantoro anthro", that is, Black's giant man. "Black", this is the name of the sponsor of the finds, in fact, part of it was lost, in the Second World War it all disappeared, due to shipments and other things. He hid it, Koenigswald, he himself was in a Japanese concentration camp, he hid all this in a bottle and buried it somewhere in the house. After the war, they began to study this and found some fragments of skulls already in Indonesia. At first he was called "meganthrope", then his name was renamed. A meganthrope is a big person, and in fact, he was also, according to modern estimates, this meganthrope, 3-5 meters like this, if it's the same. It's just that there are fragments, there is no complete skeleton, of course, so roughly 3-5 meters, somewhere near this. Then there were excavations already in Königswald, Vandenreich continued after the war, they were in Chinese caves, caves of gigantopithecus, the so-called. Here are the Gigantopithecus caves, they are in Berma, they are not only in China, in the Sivali Hills region, on the border of India, Pakistan and China, in fact, bones were found in the area, but mostly teeth, many teeth, teeth of giants, and jaws, lower jaws, they are of this human type, not ape, very reduced fangs. And in general, it is clear that the early gigantopithecus, they had a more human morphology, and the later more monkey, that is, they have a diastema, a gap between the teeth for insertion, that is, the canines grow, and the jaw acquires a more monkey U-shaped shape ... This suggests that there was this degradation in the line of gigantopithecus, they descend from, apparently, giant people. Moreover, the early gigantopithecus, they are more modest in size, and the later ones, they are more like that, absolutely gigantic, there are about 3, some researchers give them a height of 4 and 5 meters. Here is our Soviet researcher Yakimov, he believed that gigantopithecus, meganthropes, this population reached 5 meters and weighed half a ton, this is this individual. But then anthropologists changed their attitude, firstly, this is all so hushed up in part, and secondly, they say that the teeth are large, the jaws are large, and since nothing has been found, it may be like the parantropes. The paranthropes, massive australopithecines had big teeth, everything else is quite modest, they say, they say, they also have, but in fact they were not that big, two with a cap, and that's it. But these logical arguments, if they wanted, they would have gone and unearthed a long time ago, but since there is no excavation there, I think you can find there for sure, especially in the caves of the gigantopithecus, where the locals simply collect it all. As they believe, they have a belief that these are dragon teeth, they grind it all into powder, these dragon teeth, and add it to food, that is, this is their medicine. That is, they did not grind a single jaw, not a single skeleton in this way, so you can redeem even from them, if you had money. I even had an acquaintance, Kashnitsky, he worked at MK, a businessman offered him to look at the bones, he went, even, in my opinion, made a report about this bone, went to MK, it was 15-20 years ago ... The thigh bone is large, it is kept by him, by a businessman, but, unfortunately, I have not seen this bone, I don’t know, a fake, not a fake, maybe real. They found something in the Moscow Kremlin, a giant skull, the same Kashnitsky told me about it. A giant skull, so it is not complete, of course, but nevertheless, and they studied this case, there is also no data, where it went, where it is now, it is not clear. Kashnitsky has already died.
There were finds, also already associated with the territory of modern Russia, of course, there were, but somehow I don’t remember that much, we just have poor preservation of human finds here, we do not have such a rift as in the African desert in East Africa, where it is everything lies on the surface, the fossil, when it diverges, and all the layers are opened, we don't have that. The forest-steppe, it does not contribute to the preservation of the remains, that is, it all rots calmly. And then, there were some, now I just don’t remember, there was some evidence that they even participated in the Turkish, Mongolian yoke, the so-called, there were such, they were called "devas", they participated in armies, literally there are tamerlans and others. This is typical for any earlier campaigns of the Iranian kings, here in Skif the same thing, they had some kind of division where these giants with chains, roughly speaking, so that they would not run away, they used them as gladiators so powerful. There is a giant population in Baluchistan, in this area, there is also in the Pamirs, giants also live, they are more than two meters, and there are Pamiri, and India, there is a city there, but not far away, this is North India, and there is also a population there. giants, they are also more than two meters, they are constantly recruited into this guard of this palace in Delhi, these are just local residents. They are Caucasians, but they are all Caucasians, Hindus, they just have more Caucasian features like that. And there is a 19th century photo there, when different Europeans were photographed with them, and even the beginning of the 20th, here they are somewhere even a shoulder, not just a shoulder, but even up to the chest, up to the waist of these giants, and they are with guns with such, with with their turbans, they guard this Delhi palace. Ubuntu Bantu, this nation, it is also considered to be quite tall, tall, there is, but in other places of the planet, that is, in general, it is not such a rarity, giants. Another thing is where and how they came from, this is a big question.
The ability of people to believe in miracles has long been a reliable source of income for all kinds of fraudsters. This time, the forger was not chasing a long dollar - he worked out of love for art ...
In this article, I would like to analyze in detail a fairly large-scale falsification of the last decade. Its essence is that supposedly all over the Earth archaeologists find the remains of giant people, up to 2, 3, 4 and even 10 meters tall. This has become a tasty morsel for fans of various kinds of sensation, conspiracy theories. Many sites, starting with those who just love sensations of any kind (very "yellow" sites), and ending with creationist sites, actively publish more and more photos of the found "remains", "exposing the theory of evolution of official science," demonstrating these same " photographs of "giants. Immediately, lovers of everything mystical and mysterious began to put forward versions that it was it who built the pyramids, placed the stones of Stonehenge - in a word, he created all the ancient Wonders of the World, which are supposedly beyond the power of an ordinary person.
There is nothing surprising in the fact that in our time people believe, to put it mildly, unreliable rumors. You want secrets, you want riddles, even where there are none. What is surprising is not that there are sensation lovers, but how many of them there are. By typing in Google the query "giant skeleton", we will see a sea of sites where photos of the "remains" are posted; hundreds of people in the comments enthusiastically write: "now I believe!" and curse modern science for hiding the truth.
Gunpowder is added to the fire by the fact that in some religions and myths of antiquity giants and giants are mentioned. "So this is it, the lost link!" - gullible people exclaim. Meanwhile, using false facts to prove any, even the most correct hypothesis, you can only spoil both your reputation and the credibility of the hypothesis.
Let's take a look at what these amazing "photographs" are and where they came from. Let's start with the very first and famous of them.
Return to the valley of the giants - a photomontage depicting an archaeological excavation of a giant humanoid skeleton, which in 2002 won third place in the graphic design competition "Archaeological Anomalies-2", which was held at www.worth1000. com. ... Soon after the publication, the photo spread widely on the Internet and, with accompanying articles, was published by some media as proof of the existence of an ancient race of giants, references to which are contained in the Bible and the myths of many peoples. After the misunderstanding was discovered, the author of the photomontage, known under the pseudonym IronKite, gained some notoriety in the communities of graphic designers and researchers of anomalous phenomena.
History
In 2004, a photograph from an archaeological site of a giant humanoid skeleton circulated on the Internet and in some print media. Based on the size of the figures of the archaeologists in the same photograph, the length of the skeleton was estimated at 18-24 meters. The first internet reports claimed that the find was made in a desert in western India by a National Geographic expedition. According to the source, the territory of the excavations was cordoned off by the Indian army, and all the details are classified. The message also spoke about the finds of stone tablets with ancient inscriptions in Sanskrit, according to which the skeletons belonged to the mythical giants Rakshasas, who defied the gods and were destroyed by them.
Another version of this story was published on April 24, 2004 in the Bangladeshi newspaper The New Nation. According to this newspaper, the find was made in the desert in the southeast of Saudi Arabia by the search group of Saudi Aramco, conducting a search for natural gas deposits. It was also claimed that tablets with inscriptions in Arabic were found in the burial, according to which the remains belonged to the representatives of the ancient tribe Aad, the descendants of the Old Testament prophet Noah mentioned in the Bible and the Koran. The tribe challenged the designs of Allah and was destroyed by him. The site was cordoned off by Saudi troops, and the picture was taken from a military helicopter.
Similar articles were published in the March 2007 issue of the Indian magazine Hindu Voice, published in Mumbai, and subsequently in several other print media.
An elementary examination of the photograph made by the center for the study of paranormal phenomena Rationalist International found that independent sources of information about the find did not exist, and the photograph itself bears traces of program processing using a graphic editor. The most obvious sign of counterfeiting was the varying direction and intensity of the shadows cast by the giant skeleton and its surroundings. A more detailed study showed that the photo is a montage of fragments of several images. Apparently, this was a snapshot of a real archaeological excavation, in the central part of which an enlarged image of a human skeleton is mounted.
Later, the source of the photomontage was installed.
Society spokesman James Owen conducted an investigation. And I found, excuse the pun, "where the legs grow from" in this skeleton.
As the investigation showed, the photo of the giant came from the well-known website worth1000.com, which hosted a graphic design competition called "Archaeological Anomalies." The aim of the contestants was to create images illustrating fictional archaeological finds. The site publishes works of various orientations, ranging from frankly humorous and ending with high-quality imitations of photos of archaeological excavations. The author of the work, a Canadian illustrator known by the pseudonym IronKite, told National Geographic magazine in an email that he was not trying to mislead anyone. However, the image fell on fertile soil - many do not doubt that giants once lived on Earth.
Here is a link to the actual work with Giants by IronKite on the site worth1000.com
Soon, one of the original photographs was discovered, which served as material for editing. It was taken on September 16, 2000 at Hyde Park, New York, where a Cornell University paleontological team led by Professor John Chiment was excavating the remains of a mastodon between 14 and 11 years old. thousand years.
The National Geographic Society, founded back in 1888 in the United States, is one of the oldest in the world. Since that time, it has been publishing the famous National Geographic magazine. And now, keeping pace with the era, he also publishes daily news on the Internet on his National Geographic News portal.
Society is an authoritative organization. They trust her. It is full of people who believe that the photographs of the giant skeleton that have been circulating on the Internet for several years now are genuine. They excite the imagination and make one believe in conspiracies of scientists against civilization. After all, the find of a gigantic skeleton is "hanged" specifically on the geographic society. Allegedly, his specialists participated in the excavations.
Any sane person can easily guess that the photos are fake, says photo editor Sebastian John of National Geographic News. “However, we regularly receive requests that come in by hundreds of e-mails from all over the world. Like, tell me, what kind of skeleton is this? Is it true that they found it? Where is he now? Is it hidden from prying eyes?
National Geographic could not resist, and in 2007 published a refutation of these photographs - but things are still there. More and more "remains" are being created, and I would not be surprised if they say to me - "Well, look, there are so many photos! It cannot be that all this was a fake! ". Alas, all this is really the fruit of the creativity of people who masterfully (and sometimes very badly) own Photoshop. And the beginning of this story surprisingly coincides with the publication of the work on worth1000.com. A lot of photographs are easily explained by the multitude of "workers" looking for "remains" in the Photoshop environment.
The IronKite pioneer seems to be followed by followers. And now the internet is full of giant skeletons.
These classic "giant pics" are now literally circulating from one yellow site to another, through e-mail, blogs and forums in order to stir the imagination of the ignorant layman.
Many do not doubt the authenticity of the images. In fact, the "giant skeleton" is not a photograph of real discoveries. However, observations show that the high quality of the fake images, combined with the vaguely plausible explanations that accompany them, seem to be sufficient to convince many recipients. that the "discoveries" are genuine.
By the way, IronKite's work has even been shown on YouTube. The creator of the video uses the giant IronKite skeleton, along with other questionable images, as "proof" that giants once lived on Earth. The well-documented image hoax, in addition to the number of logical flaws, has sparked a series of sacks from YouTube users.
Even if you believe that a race of giants existed on Earth, you can be sure that these photos do not reflect some of their remains. They take their original origins from the Worth1000 competition, and the status of the image as a purely fictional "archaeological discovery" is understandable.
Not only do objects cast shadows in different directions, so the skeleton does not fit into the panorama of the image at all due to the difference in angles. The skeleton lacks perspective, most likely due to the fact that the source was a photograph of an ordinary skeleton, taken vertically, while the landscape in which it was placed was shot at an angle with perspective.
The giant Atlantean skeleton is found in the ocean again!
1. The color border on the left side of the picture catches the eye. The skeleton is simply glued onto the coral reef background.
2. The lower right part of the school of fish is translucent - this indicates a low professional level of the photographer. Instead of neatly cutting the fish out onto a new layer, he feathers and lowers the opacity of the layer.
3. And, as always, symmetry breaking. The size of the skull is out of proportion to the size of the femurs. Apparently, to emphasize the size of the skeleton, the skull was enlarged.
A seasoned photoshop, who knows his business, has worked here. He got burned out of ignorance of the anatomy of the human body. The size of the vertebrae is too huge for the size of the skull.
The edges of the pasted black-and-white image of the skeleton into the pit are clearly visible. In addition, the quality of the source with skeletons is much worse than the main image, this is especially noticeable when magnifying
Verdict: Nice craft in Photoshop.
Allegedly different finds of giant skulls, which in themselves are very mediocre fakes when comparing images, provide more information
This is the same normal sized skull, if we take both skulls and match them as shown in the picture, we can see that they are identical. Even if we imagine for a second that these are the same excavations, then why did the skull change its size 3 times? ...
On the left in the photo, the skull is larger than a seated person, and if we consider that a person is closer to us than a skull, then in reality the skull would be even larger.
On the right, we also see a skull, but this time it is decently smaller than a seated person, while the skull is in the foreground, if you put it next to a person, it will be 2 times smaller.
In the picture on the left, the skull literally drowned in the plane of the earth, no less smiling is the frame hanging in the air. Besides, where has it been seen that unique finds are literally trampled underfoot?
Verdict: not the best forgeries of a giant, using an ordinary skull.
Considering the various options for the giant's forgeries, I was curious if I could repeat something similar using only the most basic skills in the graphics program Adobe Photoshop. I decided to create some similar images.
As you can see, it is not difficult to create something like this.
Note: The "photos of giants" surfing the Internet make them stand out for their individuality. You will not find a "giant skeleton photograph" taken several times from different angles. Single images everywhere. I can't believe that such a unique find was removed only once from one position. This once again confirms the individuality of the work on the production of "photographs of giants". The creators from the Worth1000.com website simply had no goal to mislead the public, so each of them limited themselves to a single work, it is not surprising that the network also lacks diverse images of at least one giant, "shot" from different angles. Moreover, it is much more difficult to create such an image.
Another fact is not in favor of the giants. Giant human bones are not exhibited in any museum in the world. But enthusiasts, led by the historian Michael Baigent, author of the acclaimed book Forbidden Archeology, blame the representatives of traditional science for this. They say that they specially hid unique finds. From sin further. Because otherwise it would be necessary to change views on evolution, and on the entire history of mankind.
The absurdity of this "argument" can be realized after reading the article
Pseudoscience as it is
Quite often, from parascientific works, one can learn about some "forbidden" discoveries that pose a threat to established ideas and, therefore, are hidden from the public.
Without exception, all such messages are fiction. A researcher who stumbles upon something truly remarkable will seek to report the find in order to immortalize his name over the centuries. If, for some reason, he delayed the publication, the envious colleagues would certainly not miss the opportunity to ascribe the discovery to themselves. Even if the government intervenes, for some reason wishing to hide the truth, the unfriendly states, having found out the secret with the help of their special services, will immediately stop this attempt.
And yet there is something gigantic in museums - teeth. They look almost human, but 6 times larger than ours. First discovered in 1935 by the Dutch paleontologist Königswald in ... one of the pharmacies in Hong Kong. According to estimates, their owners would have to weigh 350-400 kilograms.
Many "giants" still "trump" with these teeth, attributing them to mythical giants - the predecessors of people. However, it is known that in 1956 in southern China, in the Guangxi province, archaeologists unearthed three huge jaws with exactly the same teeth. And they determined that they belonged to the great apes - the so-called gigantopithecus. Yes, these primates were huge - almost four meters high. Such mini king kongs. But not people.
What about myths?
Giant enthusiasts continue to trumpet the past existence of giants, first of all they refer to countless myths. Naturally, it is difficult to find a people who would not have folded legends about giants - one listing of their national names would take a whole book page.
What are myths? Here are the lines from the Bible: "At that time there were giants on earth, especially from the time when the sons of God began to enter the daughters of men, and they began to give birth ..."
Elsewhere in the Bible, there is a "report" from the scouts sent by Moses to Palestine: "... There we saw giants ... from a gigantic family; and we were ... before them, like locusts ...".
Another reason is the strange Cyclopean buildings. And the most amazing of them is the Baalbek Terrace in Lebanon, located about a hundred kilometers from Beirut. At its base, archaeologists have discovered monolithic stone blocks measuring 21 x 5 x 4 meters. Some weigh 800 tons. And they are fitted so neatly that it is difficult to put even a needle between the edges. Who, if not the giant tilers, was able to lay them down?
However, according to skeptics, Baalbek is not the best argument in favor of the existence of giants, says anthropologist Andrei Grinevsky. - Yes, no one can explain yet how the 800-ton stone blocks were laid. But to assume that they were dragged by 20-meter giants is naive. With this growth, a maximum of six can grasp the monolith. In total, more than 100 tons "per brother". Do not pick up.
There are huge foot prints - the most famous of which is located in South Africa. It was found by a local farmer Stoffel Coetsey at the beginning of the last century. The "left footprint" is imprinted into an almost vertical wall to a depth of about 12 centimeters. Its length is 1m 28 centimeters. They assure: "inherited" a person about 10 meters tall. Came here hundreds of millions of years ago when the rock was soft. Then it froze, turned into granite and stood upright due to geological processes.
In my opinion, the footprint only looks like a human one. But there are no indisputable signs. A stone, which later fell out, could have left him. And a dinosaur.
What if giants really lived on Earth?
Excavations testify: there was a time when giants lived on Earth. And not lizards, but mammals. Some became extinct long ago - in the last ice age. Others - much later - about a thousand years BC. And people could see them
Giant short-faced bear,
living in Alaska and Chukotka, it reached almost 5 meters if it got up on its hind legs. I ran, by the way, on them at a speed of almost 70 kilometers per hour.
The 5-ton giant sloth was no less a fast-moving bear.
And to the size of the current hippopotamus, beavers and rats were swinging. In a word, gigantism is not alien to nature. So why should people be the exception?
The answer lies in the very structure and proportions of the human body. If you look at the typical representatives of giants (dinosaurs, elephants and others), then they all have in common: the horizontal arrangement of the spine, a relatively small head, the center of mass is concentrated in the lower part of the body.
The legs of a typical mammal support the weight of its body, and as the weight of the animal increases, the strength of the support must increase accordingly. Let us assume that all the linear dimensions of the animal have doubled. The mass of such an enlarged animal will then increase 8 times, that is, as a cube of linear dimensions, which should affect the strength of the supporting structures. To prevent these structures from collapsing, their cross-section must increase in proportion to the eightfold increase in the load, but if all dimensions are simply doubled, the cross-sectional area of the bones will only increase fourfold. This is clearly not enough, and in order to support the eightfold increase in weight, the bones must increase disproportionately.
A three-fold increase in linear dimensions gives a 27-fold increase in mass, and the cross-sectional area of the bone should be increased by a factor of 27.
Measurement of the ultimate strength of mammalian bones of different weights from 0.05 to 700 kg (14,000-fold difference) did not reveal any significant differences (233 ± 53 MN / m2 in small animals and 200 ± 28 in large animals) (Biewener, 1982) ...
Moreover, the mass of a mammalian skeleton does not fit into schemes that take into account only gravitational loads. During movement, forces always arise due to acceleration or deceleration, which twist and bend the skeleton, and its elements must withstand these forces and not break primarily under the influence of bends.
Those. if a person has linear dimensions of 20 meters (i.e. more than 10 times the norm), then his volume (and mass) increases 1000 (10 cubed) times, i.e. it weighs about 80 tons (80,000 kg). And this is not compatible with life, because it will simply be crushed (even in the supine position, the chest will collapse) under our gravity.
Thus ... Yes, giants may be, but they will not look like people, and their skeletons will not look like humans. Here's another simple example. If a person with a height of 180 cm and a weight of 80 kg is quadrupled to 720 cm, then his weight will be 5120 kg, and bones with such dimensions in human proportions will be optimally adjusted only for 1280 kg, that is, the additional mass above the optimal one will be 3840 kg (i.e., the area the cross-section of bones will increase 16 times, but the body weight will already increase 64 times), the bones simply will not withstand such an overload, this is equivalent to the fact that a person 180 cm tall and weighing 80 kg, with the same muscles and bones, will hang a load of 240 kg for life, and what will become of his joints and spine? I mean that with gigantic dimensions, the cross-section of the bones should be proportionally much larger, depending on the magnification factor. Therefore, if there were giants-people, then their skeletons will look completely different from the photoshopped photos from the sites of Photoshop lovers. That's all. Well, the skeletons of giants were really found - these are dinosaurs, which, with such dimensions, had powerful bones and could not do without a tail, and their center of gravity was completely different, like the principle of constructing a skeleton for such a mass.
What are giants sick with?
In ancient times, myths and legends associated high growth with some kind of superpowers, and the "giants" have always enjoyed great respect. However, according to doctors, high growth can result in poor health, and this is especially true for women. The tallest woman in the world, Sandy Allen, recently died at the age of only 53 - and she, alas, suffered from many chronic diseases.
The height of the American Sandy Allen was 2 meters 32 centimeters - that is, three centimeters higher than that of the famous Chinese basketball player Yao Ming.
She was only slightly inferior to other tallest people in the world - Ukrainian Leonid Stadnik (2 meters 53 centimeters) and Tunisian Radhuan Charbib (2 meters 36 centimeters). The cause of Allen's death is still unknown, but in the hospital where she was, she was given numerous dangerous diagnoses.
These include diabetes, a tendency to infection, and kidney failure. In addition, it was difficult for her to walk, so she spent the last years of her life in a wheelchair.
A person is destroyed by gravity - after all, his muscles and bones are simply not adapted for such growth. In such people, the proportions of the skull are disturbed, the feet and hands increase to an enormous size, the tongue becomes huge - and because of this, giants very often suffer from shortness of breath.
Conclusion
Today, on the Internet, it is not difficult to find sites replete with bright headlines about the discovery of the millennium, about a hidden sensation. Demand creates supply. People believe, to put it mildly, unreliable rumors that excite the imagination. You want secrets, you want riddles, even where there are none. What is surprising is not that there are sensation lovers, but how many of them there are.
However, if you carefully approach the issue of giants under consideration, analyze information and elementary logical calculations, an unambiguous conclusion arises that, for certain reasons, the existence of people of gigantic stature is simply impossible, it is not surprising that there is no real evidence of the former existence of giants. Some myths, dubious evidence and fraud.
Official science is still suspicious of hypotheses about the existence of gigantic people in the past. However, numerous studies by enthusiasts may well change the usual picture of human history.
Mysterious remains
Traces of the existence of giant people have been found repeatedly over the centuries. Reports of the found turtles or bones of an abnormally large size came from different parts of the planet - the USA, Egypt, Armenia, China, India, Mongolia, Australia and even the Pacific Islands. True, you will not surprise anyone with a human height over two meters. As the photographs show, in the 19th century there were people whose height significantly exceeded two meters.
However, we are talking about finds, which can be used to judge the much more impressive dimensions of humanoid individuals. In 1911, near Lovelock in the US state of Nevada, the extraction of guano was suspended, as scientists were interested in the found human skeletons with a growth of 3.5 meters.
Particularly archaeologists were struck by the jaw found away from full skeletons: its size was at least three times the jaw of an average person.
During the mining of jasper in Australia, the remains of giant people were also found, significantly exceeding three meters in height. But the real sensation was the human tooth, 67 millimeters high and 42 millimeters wide. Its owner had to be at least 6 meters tall.
Perhaps the most striking find was found by the Indian military. Found in a remote region of India "Empty Quarter", well-preserved skeletons reached a height of 12 meters! However, the place was immediately closed from prying eyes, allowing only a team of archaeologists to visit the ancient burial grounds.
Written sources
Information about the giant people is contained in almost all known ancient texts - the Torah, the Bible, the Koran, the Vedas, as well as Chinese and Tibetan chronicles, Assyrian cuneiform tablets and Maya writings.
In the book of the prophet Isaiah there is a mention of how the Jews were sent by sea "to a strong and vigorous people, to a terrible people from the beginning to the present, to a tall people and trample on everything, whose land is cut by rivers."
But there is similar information in later sources that claim to be historically accurate. The Arab diplomat Ahmed ibn Fodlan in 922 described the remains of the murdered giant during his embassy to the Volga Bulgaria: “and here I am next to this man, and I see the growth in him, measuring twelve cubits with my elbow. And now he has a head - the largest cauldron that can ever be. And the nose is more than a quarter, both eyes are huge, and each fingers are more than a quarter. "
If we assume that the elbow of the Arab traveler was of modest size, then the height of the giant was in no way lower than 4 meters.
Interestingly, Fodlan's story is indirectly confirmed by local legends about a whole tribe of giants, recorded at the end of the 18th century by Russian explorers of the Volga basin.
Stone artifacts
Traces of their material culture can be the silent witnesses of the existence of giant people. During excavations in Australia near the gigantic remains, stone tools of impressive size were discovered - plows, chisels, knives, clubs and axes, whose weight ranged from 4 to 9 kilograms.
Similar finds were made during excavations of ancient settlements in the Okavango Delta. In the collection of the Historical Society of the United States, there is a bronze ax, which is more than 1 meter high and the blade is half a meter long. The weight of the find is 150 kilograms. A modern athlete would hardly have mastered such a tool.
Even more revealing artifacts, indicating the possible presence of giants on our planet, can serve as megalithic structures - we can find them on various continents. The Lebanese Baalbek, which cannot be called otherwise than the city of giants, is of particular interest to scientists. At least, researchers still cannot scientifically explain the appearance there of stone slabs that are ideally fitted to each other, presumably weighing up to 800 tons each.
Fake!
A serious controversy has recently developed between supporters and opponents of the existence of mega-anthropes, which does not accept compromises. This is how the anthropologist Maria Mednikova calls the information about the discovery of the bones of four-meter people an ordinary fake.
"From a formal point of view," says the scientist, "it is not confirmed by documented archaeological excavations, there are no conclusions of specialists - anthropologists or forensic doctors - who could reasonably tell what these bones are."
Cases of outright falsification also cause a negative reaction from the scientific community. So, "the skeleton of the giant Teutobokh" - the king of the Cimbri, which stood for several centuries in the French Museum of Natural History, turned out to be a fake skillfully composed of the bones of a mastodon. Frequent exposure and modern finds with a careful examination of the remains of large mammals. Also, the "defenders of the giants" are discredited by the noticeably more frequent cases of Photoshop.
Habitat
The weak point of the theory of meganthropes is modern earthly conditions. Official science assures that with the current atmospheric pressure, oxygen level, gravity and other nuances, people with a height of over 3 meters simply would not have survived for purely biological reasons.
As a confirmation of this, they cite the example of people suffering from gigantism - such people, as a rule, do not live for more than 40 years. However, their opponents have counterarguments. They believe that in the distant past conditions on Earth were different, including the force of gravity was lower, and the oxygen level was about 50% higher.
The last figure is confirmed by the analysis of air bubbles "trapped" in amber. Moreover, modern physicists have modeled conditions in which the force of gravity has become an order of magnitude lower than it is now. The conclusions are as follows: weak gravity, low atmospheric pressure and high oxygen content in the air contribute to the gigantization of biological species.
Here, the official science does not particularly object - dinosaurs up to 30 meters high are a generally accepted fact. True, there is one more "but". The age of most of the machines of the giant people dates back to millions of years, and during this time even bones turn to dust, unless, of course, they are petrified.
"Borjomi giants"
However, perhaps the giants lived not so long ago. The representative of the same official science, the Georgian academician Abesalom Vekua, suggested that 3-meter people inhabited the Borjomi Gorge about 25 thousand years ago. The results of recent finds, in his opinion, could be sensational. “Pay attention to the thigh bone,” says the scientist, “it differs from the bone of a modern person in its size and thickness. The skull is also much larger. These people lived and developed separately from the rest of civilization, and therefore differed in growth. In the scientific literature, they are referred to as giants, but there was no documentary evidence for this hypothesis. Thus, we are on the verge of a sensation. But this will be preceded by painstaking work. "
Loading ...