01/21/2019 Alexey
I was supposed to fly to Jordan on 777, it broke down and I had to fly on a replacement 767 ikar - Sheremetyevo departure. I liked everything, but it feels like the plane is far from new and the distance between the seats was a bit cramped, my height is 186 ... thank God it takes 4 hours to fly. In most cases, all the chatter and other troubles are the weather and the ability to fly an airplane. It also shakes in the new 737 ... Therefore, blaming aircraft is a thankless task. 767 workhorse with plenty of traction. For comfort, I liked it more at 777-200 and 777-300. People, you better think about what you need to wear compression stockings on a flight, drink more water and move - believe me, there are worse problems in the air than all sorts of chatter, about which there are so many conversations on the forums - it shocked it, it shocked it. In the bottom line - I was preparing for a pilot, a 767 beast, but not very comfortable, this is already a question for the government, which has long needed to come up with normal laws to control the distance between the seats - the aircraft itself and its developers are not to blame. I don’t quite understand the meaning of reviews about a Boeing 767 aircraft - reviews should be written about an aircraft in such and such a company, and not just about an aircraft. Have a comfortable flight.
Is the review helpful? 8 / 1
10/26/2018 Igor
I flew several times on Boeing 767-300 aircraft with a 2-4-2 lineup. Well, this is a real cattle truck at rush hour. It’s just interesting where the government is looking? handrails will be put up soon, and they will fly standing up !!! It would be nice if it was for short flights (up to 4 hours), so they put such aircraft with a flight duration of 8 hours or longer !!! All these airlines like Azur Air, Pegasus, Nord Wind, etc. at least they got a conscience !!! Even in the former Soviet republics they don’t think of this, and ours, as always, are ahead of the rest !!!
Is the review helpful? 31 / 8
07/15/2018 Murat
In 2017, he flew on this plane from Astana to Frankfurt am Main, Air Astana. Very comfortable, seating arrangement 2+3+2. Everyone has their own monitor with a collection of films and entertainment programs. The salon is new and clean, in the toilet the toilet bowl is washed off very interestingly. Not a blue liquid as before, but sucked in by air. 6 hours of flight passed unnoticed.
Is the review helpful? 11 / 3
06/01/2018 Guest
The last time I flew on this plane was in the summer of 2015, from Moscow to Simferopol with Transaero. The distance between the seats was very tight, it is obvious that the aircraft was specially converted for short flights, the layout of the seats is 2 + 4 + 2, and the distance between the seats is very small. The flight itself went perfectly, it never shook, landing in Simferopol also went smoothly
Is the review helpful? 9 / 2
04/29/2018 Sergey
We flew to Sharm al-Sheikh the other day from Kyiv (azurair)
Beast of course.
Despite its size, it rips off on takeoff like a racing car.
In the air behaves confidently.
Salon pleased spaciousness.
Landing was harsh, but I think it's not the plane.
Actually really cool.
Is the review helpful? 11 / 8
23.02.2018 Sasha Sim, Kyiv
For the first time, they were allowed on a short 3-hour (with a tail) charter flight: Kyiv (Borispol) - Sharm El Sheikh. It turns out that our airline "Azur Air Ukraine" also has such airliners and, together with its partner "Anex tour", arrange flights for short distances - to the resorts of Egypt.
The aircraft cabin is large. It's nice to fly like this. Chairs are normal. Five monitors show only the animation of the aircraft route. It is sometimes interesting to look where we are: over Odessa or already over Cairo. And through the window to see these and other cities. It turns out an interesting binding of animation to reality. If you, like me, are sitting at the porthole. The takeoff was almost imperceptible and short, as it seemed to me, it is possible that I was constantly photographing. But the landing was terrible! Throwing up and down and from side to side - strong winds in Egypt in winter and this was the reason. Turbulence in flight was weak. (More details on the website www.facebook.com/sashasim.egypet/ ...- Facebook "Rest in Egypt")
Is the review helpful? 6 / 3
08.02.2018 VLVF
He flew Pegasus to Phuket and back. The 2-4-2 lineup is clearly not for long-haul flights. For two 10 hour night flights, I could not fall asleep even once - very uncomfortable, just creepy.
Is the review helpful? 33 / 2
12/11/2017 Guest
Ordinary plane, nothing special.
Is the review helpful? 5 / 19
10/17/2017 Guest
We flew with the AZUR air campaign St. Petersburg - Punta Cana on 04.10.2017. row 12 (D,E). The flight was 11 hours, the backs of the seats in our row did not recline. The distance from my head to the passenger in front is 15 cm.
Even very average passengers (with a height of 170 cm and above) experience great inconvenience, their knees rest against the seat in front. In a small empty space - a passage between the toilets was arranged " Kindergarten"- a blanket was spread on the floor, on which small children played. Passengers and even flight attendants reacted calmly to this, because they understood that sitting in their place, the parents of the children could not take them in their arms - there was no place.
With a full load of the vessel, 300 passengers - actually increased by 36, i.e. 4.5 rows were added.
I won’t be surprised if a few more rows, railings are delivered in the near future and passengers will be transported like in a tram ....
Is the review helpful? 54 / 2
09/18/2017 Nikita
The plane is wonderful, though not new. We flew from Seoul, takeoff, flight, landing, all for 5 s +! In flight, they fed, the toilets worked. Most of all, I remember one sociable passenger who re-transformed the cabin of the aircraft for herself, I have not seen this before))) I took it on camera -youtu.be/0DaGiSqItd4
Is the review helpful? 20 / 8
08/17/2017 Artyom
I flew this year - the airline - belongs to PegasFly. Pegasus himself struck, well, as always with them. The planes themselves are normal, well cleaned. The first flight was on a 777. And back again on a 767-300ER. The flight was soft, maybe it's the skill of the crew, of course, but still ... True, they should return to 777, but I had to 767-300ER, I thought it would be bad, I was mistaken. Slept half the flight (4 hours) From Jordan to Moscow. I didn’t fall asleep at all on 777, it cracked very cool on the runway, I already thought right now how it would be on the rocket, and really .. the take-off angle was extraordinary. Maybe the weather, maybe mistakes. They took off well. Although why did I write about 777 if there is 767-300 (ER) .. but oh well)
Is the review helpful? 6 / 32
07/30/2017 Olga
A very good plane, I flew with my mother to Greece, I really liked the landing and takeoff are soft, then what is there, then someone doesn’t like it, you don’t have to fly at all!
Is the review helpful? 8 / 25
07/17/2017 Guest
I can’t say anything about this, but Ikarovsky 767-300 how old is he? The route is chosen so bad that turbulence is in the order of things for 5.20-5.30 hours of flight out of 8 - is this normal ?? The shaking of the clear sky, so change the train, no, they will fly, I am studying to be a GA pilot, but I have never seen such an attitude towards people and the crew itself !!! Thank you for taking me at least, future colleagues pilots, I understand that a raid is needed, but not on such air routes and I understand that without it, it’s not like (chatter), but when you are not allowed or for economic reasons, you can’t do this disgusting !!! The PIC decides in the air and on board, and not ground managers who poke their numbers on the canculator!
Is the review helpful? 17 / 24
05/18/2017 Galina
We flew from Moscow to Vietnam. The penultimate row was in the tail section. With a height of 160, my knees rested on the neighbor's chair. The table did not recline completely due to the lack of space between the seats. carts with food that hit passengers. There are 4 seats in the middle row, the outer armrests do not recline. Each time I had to get up in a narrow aisle between the rows to let out passengers sitting in the center of the middle row. Not a flight, but 11 hours of torment. The flight seemed like an eternity.
Is the review helpful? 45 / 7
01/27/2017 Kirill
I flew to Phuket in December 2016 on such a plane, 7 hours to Krasnoyarsk, economy class, got off the plane when we landed, I wasn’t even tired, the lineup of seats was 2-4-2, I didn’t notice any inconvenience, there was more than enough space, so who’s here writes that inconvenience, etc. either drop it excess weight, or fly with other airlines, but you don’t need to shit here that this is a bad plane, you haven’t flown bad ones yet ..
Is the review helpful? 31 / 25
06/05/2016 Guest
06/05/2016. Flight S7-1024. Sochi-Moscow at 16:40. Everything is on schedule. Board - VP-BVH; 767-33AER.
The aircraft is in excellent condition. Both externally and internally. The smell is fresh in the cabin. Toilets don't smell.
Great step step between chairs. Everything is neat and clean. S7 - well done.
The PIC spoke to the salon, but did not introduce himself. The takeoff is very fast, the thrust of the engines is freaky. On the echelon quickly enough. The PIC told what cities we were flying over, at what altitude we were flying, etc. There was a little chat at Domodedovo, a lot of clouds. Landing on 5, the PIC came in on his hands.
In general, excellent! Thank you very much S7!
Is the review helpful? 33 / 5
05/14/2016 Roman
Hello. 767 is a very good aircraft, yes, I agree that in low-cost it has small seats and a small step, but what do you want from low-cost? As a 767 pilot, I declare that this type is good for the crew. The aircraft obeys control well. (Some " smart people"They said that he was in the zone! Strong! Chatting turbulence ... Dear, any plane will chat (777,747 and even 380 chatting). I won't say anything about landing with "jerks" ... If the plane jerked or threw, then most likely the problem in the weather, not in the sun).
X Thank you.
Is the review helpful? 75 / 7
05/06/2016 Leonid
Flying with American Airlines in a normal 2-3-2 layout. The flight is more than 7 hours and there are no problems with the convenience of accommodation and movement around the cabin. So the plane is excellent, and airlines create "comfort" for their own purposes. The inconvenience was in the excessive operation of air conditioners - Americans love the cold and even had to wear a jacket. As you can see, opposite problems.
Is the review helpful? 14 / 3
05/03/2016 Guest
767-300 - flew in April 2016. to Vietnam. Layout 2-4-2. It's not a plane, it's some kind of cattle carrier. There are so many seats crammed into the cabin that a normal Vietnamese will not fit. And what to speak for the Russians. We write-write, mother-mother, but there is no sense. There is a chic recipe that has been tested millions of times in different countries and eras - the government of the Russian Federation, let foreign airlines enter the market and all these Pegasus with their cattle trucks will shrink. And so ... chatter! Monopoly - death to all living and real. Can't wait for this in my life. Whenever possible, I will fly with foreign airlines. And the domestic manufacturer who thinks about us ... (how to rip off these sheep more), let him go ... his own way. And what are the stars? Spaces must be included.
Is the review helpful? 79 / 17
04/01/2016 Elizabeth
Great plane! I don't understand why they hate him so much! They flew from Moscow to Sharm, everything is in order, the seats are conveniently located. You can go to the toilet without pushing, and without disturbing anyone. I recommend!
Is the review helpful? 8 / 16
12/28/2015 Passenger
767-300 complete crap, 2-4-2 layout which is not advertised, passage only for trolley passage, flight delay by 36 (Thirty-six!) people who were waiting for our arrival were deprived of a couple of days of rest out of 11 paid. I wish this barn with wings a worthy place in the dustbin of history.
Is the review helpful? 38 / 33
Transaero 767-300 in 2-4-2 configuration - complete disgusting. The tightness is terrible, the width of the seats is small, you almost sit on your neighbor’s knees, it’s impossible to eat, your elbows are like paws on a praying mantis, they rest on your knees, those sitting next to you rest on their shoulders, you can’t stretch your legs. I flew on it for 8 hours. No entertainment - no music, nothing. On TV, for eight hours they played the animation of the flight route and showed how Tsar Peter the Arap got married. He flew from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to Moscow-Domodedovo, such a disgrace in general! The website does not show this set. In general, this is an excellent aircraft for guest workers who fly around Russia. This aircraft has luggage compartment remove and put Uzbeks there, add intermediate landings across Russia and get a miracle flight of business labor.
Is the review helpful? 56 / 18
05/27/2015 Tsai is simple
To Burgas on 11.05, back on 25.05. By Siberians S7. Aircraft B 767-300. Excellent and only. Great liners. I have a huge height. 168 cm. Nothing interfered. 2-3-2. You can dance all 2.h.15m. flying between the seats and in the aisles .. A chic plane. There is one question for the captain "who drove us there." When getting in touch with passengers during takeoff from Domodedovo, he introduced himself to us as the crew commander, without telling us his name. But we applaud . And when landing in Burgas, people applauded. And we didn’t know the name of our wonderful Captain. And I remember the name of the crew commander of the AN-24 flight Chardzhou-Tashauz. in 1975, carried out by the Chardjouz air squadron, the Turkmen department of civil aviation .. The surname of this Captain is POOR. Until the grave, I will remember the name of my old COMMANDER. And Siberian Captains I also want to know and remember.
Is the review helpful? 11 / 41
05/22/2015 Guest Igor
On May I flew to Egypt on the B767-300. At 1.68, my knees rested on the front seat.
Is the review helpful? 32 / 7
03/24/2015 Vatokatov
I flew Novosibirsk-Bangkok-Novosibirsk, B767-300, "Transaero" ... salon 2-4-2, before that I flew on the same route on the B767 from "airline "Siberia" 2-3-2, this is normal the layout for this aircraft, and not baby seats from Transaero. I immediately remembered the cartoon where the greedy gentleman wanted to sew two hats out of the skin, then three ... in the end he agreed to seven), respectively, and received seven hats, the size of a thimble ))). "Transaero" could just put handrails in the cabin so that it would fly standing and there would be something to hold on to and cram three times more people.
Is the review helpful? 49 / 2
02/08/2015 Igor 02/28/2015
We flew from Khabarovsk to Bangkok on vacation and back to them. The impression was terrible. We flew for 8 hours. It was full of people like herrings in a barrel. The charter flight was a Pegasus tourist. Not a foot in this airplane anymore. There were not enough blankets for everyone. Headphones were not handed out. They turn on the air conditioner, then turn it off, it’s not clear how. It’s stuffy in the cabin. The button for calling the conductors didn’t work for me.
Is the review helpful? 33 / 10
07.10.2014 Eugene
Cool plane! I flew on it from Bangkok to Tashkent. 6 hours flew by almost unnoticed. Comfortable chairs with plenty of room to put your feet. Fun in every chair. You can listen to music, watch movies, play games. The range is small of course, but enough for 6 hours. flew Uzbekistan Airways. The plane is not old, the flight itself also went well. In general, satisfied!
Is the review helpful? 13 / 12
08/10/2014 Guest
"Flight Blagoveshchensk-Moscow, 767-300, almost 8 hours (08/07/14) Aeroflot, lineup 2-4-2, like herrings in a barrel"
No wonder, this is a charter flight from Russia, there is not even a business salon there. Aeroflot only sells tickets for this flight under the SU code, but in fact Russia is lucky
Is the review helpful? 16 / 8
04/20/2014 Alexey
Although I am not a frequent flyer, I had a chance to fly on this to Egypt with a transaero in a 2-4-2 layout, if I knew that this was such a torment, I would have taken a tour from other operators.
An aircraft for people up to 160 and weighing up to 50 kg, if such people fly long distances for more than 5 hours, then this is a mockery of people. 737-300 737-800 which I flew earlier are much more comfortable
Is the review helpful? 25 / 7
02/11/2014 Ekaterina
On February 6, we flew from Bongkok, flew back and forth on this plane, no complaints, the only thing that depressed me the most was nowhere to put my legs, really, very crowded. It feels like there are more seats than it should be.
Is the review helpful? 25 / 6
01/22/2014 Guest
Flew both 767 s7s on New Year. Great plane. Takeoff, flight and landing flawlessly. The flight lasted 8 hours. The only downside is the damn economy. Well, I'll tell you everywhere. Take the business and you will be happy.
Is the review helpful? 18 / 10
12/15/2013 Guest
I flew on a Transaero flight to Moscow, board EI-UNA, charter option, economy seats 2-4-2, I was sitting by the window, at first I didn’t understand why it was so crowded and the chair was a little narrower than usual, and then looking in the middle I saw that there are four seats ... It's just tryndets, driving such a board over long distances is just a mockery of the passengers, the distance between the seats with a height of 180 cm was normal. I flew back to EI-UNE, nice salon, seats as usual 2-3-2, the flight was at night, I slept well, the chair was comfortable.
Is the review helpful? 15 / 4
11/21/2013 Vladimir
I have been flying for a long time and a lot, since I have been living in Magadan for 50 years, of all the Boeing 767-300 aircraft, the most convenient, reliable and best, you fly and relax, the time in flight passes unnoticed! God bless the one who created this health liner, and all the passengers who fly on any type of aircraft have wonderful takeoffs and landings!
Is the review helpful? 34 / 8
11/19/2013 Guest
They flew from Moscow to Yakutsk with Aeroflot and Transaero, Aeroflot’s car is newer, cleaner, the seats are more comfortable, but there is no service and food, Transs have better service, 2 times and better. I was not tired, the AFL flight attendants were aged and tired, the Transs had young girls, I flew the same route on the AFL IL-96, 767 is more convenient and there is more space between the seats, besides, 96 has no luggage rack above the middle rows. A child is 1.2 months old .in the AFL they didn’t give anything. Good luck to everyone.
Is the review helpful? 3 / 2
10/30/2013 supermax54
The best places in Boeing 767 airlines s7:
we are talking here specifically about the board VQ-BBI. this is one of two 767 in Siberia)
economy rows from 6 to 10 inclusive next to the business, fenced off from the rest of the economy by a partition.
on these rows at all, including the 8th row, there are portholes. feel free to take if you have time))
row 11 just behind the partition, a little less legroom but no one overhanging, more space.
row 27 is wide, opposite the emergency exits! but - without windows at all, a small peephole does not count))
respectively 26 row - the backs do not fall, the worst row in the plane)
on the last row, the backs fall, do not be afraid.
the wing obscures the view from the 15th row to the 27th approximately.
all happy flights, c7 is a good airline))
Is the review helpful? 49 / 0
10/18/2013 AGRESSOR
The first time we flew long-haul. Flight R-n-D - Bangkok. The aircraft is owned by North Wind Airlines. The car is quite decent: take-off-5, at the echelon (although the "turbo" passed four times) - 5, landing - 5. Naturally, this is the passenger's opinion. There is confidence in the car, although more depends on the crews. Protect the LORD all who are in the sky!
Is the review helpful? 16 / 5
07/10/2013 Guest
We flew on this plane Novosibirsk-Barcelona-Novosibirsk 25/06/2013-08/07/2013. It is crowded, there is not enough space between the seats, it is very inconvenient for people of dense complexion to fly for 8 hours. And the rest is great. We flew from Barcelona in the very tail, on the last row, it didn’t even shake much. NordWind, the entire flight attendant crew and Captain Igor Kolmogorov did a great job. Very soft landing in Novosibirsk.
Is the review helpful? 1 / 0
07/04/2013 Guest
I flew with Aeroflot to Kamchatka. The car is what you need. The travel bag fits easily both on the luggage rack and under the seat. Legs practically do not get tired, you can even stretch a little. But there were no monitors :(
Is the review helpful? 1 / 1
06/20/2013 Guest
The plane is good, most importantly reliable. There is one question, flying from Blagoveshchensk to Moscow on the 2-4-2 option is very difficult, just really inconvenient. I looked at the Transaero website, there are 11 767-300 machines and the layout of the cabins of each, but none of the 11 aircraft has 2-4-2 cabins. Then where did this come from? We flew back from Moscow on a 2-3-2 layout, very comfortable, the flight was excellent, we landed in Blagoveshchensk perfectly /FAC Vinogradov/. Many thanks to the pilots and cabin crew.
Is the review helpful? 4 / 1
04/22/2013 Guest
We flew from St. Petersburg to Phuket, North Wind Airlines. Everything arranged, though on the way back the board conductors turned out to be sleepy and inept. And the lack of blankets made me tense. When you sit at the window and outside the window -60 for 10 hours - it's horror.
Is the review helpful? 0 / 9
04/07/2013 Guest
We flew Boeing 767-300 ER S7 Airlines (if you have another option, it's better not to "Siberia") Khabarovsk-Bangkok and back January 2013, business class. The planes are old, the seats do not fold out horizontally, it is very uncomfortable to sleep. There is no entertainment (even music in headphones, not to mention films). Food, service is good. In the economy class in the 8th row there were no windows, and in both planes.
Tickets were bought in advance, at the rate of an improved economy class, so they cost 5 thousand more than a simple economy class. It's nice that time was not wasted on registration (in Bangkok there is a separate counter) and the suitcases were the first to be received.
Is the review helpful? 4 / 8
03/31/2013 Guest
We flew in March Yekaterinburg - Phuket a / c Transaero, the layout of seats 2-4-2 is something, one would like to ask: when will the Russians stop mocking the Russians? Not only is there clearly not enough space, but the chairs are just tiny, with deaf side armrests. I was flying with my wife on a two-seat row and my hip was constantly resting against her, and this was for 9 hours, and imagine there would be an outsider, I am already silent about 4-row seats. And all this, taking into account the fact that I am not the largest in size, but next to me was a tall man and 130 kilograms, so he had to look for a place separately !!! We flew back in a 2-3-2 layout and this is a completely different comfort with other seats, by the way, there is a good row 27 along the edges at the emergency exit X P.S. There are no complaints about the service, even somewhere it’s a pity for the stewardess girls, because they also have to work in these narrow aisles
Is the review helpful? 4 / 0
03/12/2013 Guest
Arrived yesterday barbados stockholm 9 hours flight seat 20b. I do not like the United States, but the plane is good.
Is the review helpful? 2 / 7
10/07/2012 Guest
I flew with Transaero. Great plane, great service. The only plane in which I (height 186) was VERY comfortable. There is where to place your legs, stretch out, TV, music, I advise!
Is the review helpful? 1 / 4
09/05/2012 Guest
We flew in August on v767. Flight Irkutsk-Sharm El-Sheikh via Krasnoyarsk a/k Severny wind. The size of the engines immediately inspires calmness. During the flight, it shook less than on the A320 and B737, and the wing shakes less in turbulence. It has already been said about convenience, so with his 192 cm height he sat for 8 hours “diagonally”. Whoever wants comfort should take row 31 near the emergency exits, by the way, the 2-4-2 layout begins from this row. For those who like to admire the beauties of the earth - from about 22 to 30 rows of space above the wing - there are no landscapes to be seen. What is curious, when they flew half-empty from Krasnoyarsk to Irkutsk, the plane shook almost all the time, but tolerable.
Is the review helpful? 2 / 0
09/02/2012 Guest
We flew this Boeing a / c "Russia" combined with Aeroflot. There - they took off sharply and quickly from deep into the "pit", they took their breath away, people gasped in unison, back - they took off smoothly. Interestingly, it depends on the character of the pilot or on professionalism. The Boeings of the Rossiya airline are clearly "adult", even unpleasant, the dirt between the seats has dried up tightly from time to time, the seats are shabby .. The crew is ordinary, everything is within limits. Didn't rock especially.
Is the review helpful? 1 / 0
04/14/2010 Guest
Flew AEROFLOTOVSKIM 767 300 excellent aircraft and everything else is super. Incomparable with transaero
Is the review helpful? 1 / 3
13.04.2010 Guest from Stavropol
I often fly on the route Moscow - Khabarovsk on the B-767-300 (although sometimes Il-96 is installed)
everything suits me as a passenger in this type of aircraft (at Aeroflot)
comfortable chairs, distance between seats, monitors, moderate hum of engines
food is good (2 times), blankets, pillows, headphones, the interior is not cramped
after an 8-hour flight there is no fatigue, the flight is a pleasure
a separate word to the crew - always on top, there were no problems
Is the review helpful? 2 / 1
04/03/2010 Guest
Great plane! Takeoff and landing are just super, of course, and the pilots in the transaero aces, the only problem is the wear and tear of the ships, and I recommend this car to everyone!
Is the review helpful? 0 / 1
03/26/2010 GuestS.P
I flew last year on 767 AFL twice on different planes. Quite comfortable, clean, quiet. Landing and takeoff are good. They landed in Moscow in bad weather, sat down gently. Of course, it all depends on the pilots and the weather. And so it’s quite comfortable. Enough space between the seats. Large boxes for hand luggage clean cabins. It can be seen that the salons are looked after. A flight at eight o'clock is easily tolerated. The layout is 2-3-2. Transaero has 2-4-2 they speak very closely. IL86 is bigger of course
Is the review helpful? 0 / 0
03/17/2010 Ilya
The plane is not bad, but it has one big minus - very little space, nowhere to stretch your legs, the back almost does not recline! Sit big man not possible, between armrests, butt size 54 not included!
Is the review helpful? 0 / 0
03/09/2010 Guest
They flew on March 7, 2010 by flight UN 428 Phuket - St. Petersburg on a Boeing 767-300 (1) of Transaero. Flight time is 11 hours. The distance between the seats in the economy class is 19.5 cm - you have to sit in this gap all 11 hours! Specific places - 35G and 35 F. An attempt by a neighbor to stick his legs out into the aisle ended sadly - he fell under a cart with Dutik trash. Option one - stand at the toilets in the tail of the plane most flight. Thus, Transs have introduced standing places on their flights and charge full price for them.
Is the review helpful? 5 / 1
26.02.2010 Alexander
Guest dated 02/12/2010, I hasten to inform you ("noodles" is completely inappropriate here), that as recently as 02/22/2010 I had the pleasure of flying flight UN-104 UUS-DME on B767-200 EI-DBW. Location 22H, near the emergency hatch. The muzzle is godless. No blankets and their outerwear did not save. The last time I encountered a similar phenomenon was on the Tu-154 85610 ("shed", place - near the back front door in the middle of the cabin). Who and what in these cases forgot to "close" - it's hard not to appreciate your sarcasm - an ordinary passenger is not very interested. Although it is obvious that in both cases (the Boeing is 23 years old and the Tu-154 was almost the same age), the age, insufficient sealing of doors and hatches affects. On new or not very old cars, this does not manifest itself so painfully (9 hours under cold air flow cause discomfort at best, and snot and something more interesting at worst). So everything requires care and respect for age. Although they often save on this, regardless of the sound of the historical surname.
In general, I like 767: neither narrow nor wide, 2-3-2 is good, the shelves do not press, as in 777, and they are quite enough for a normal passenger, and not for a bagman. The fact that the 767 has been working great for over 20 years speaks for itself. The car is comfortable, solid, reliable. And 2-4-2 is a layout only for cheap charters, but not for regular flights with regular fares. As proud as Rossiya is of its 767, flying the LED-KHV in such conditions is humiliating. Especially against the background of 767 and A330 of other airlines flying to the East (Petersburg is clearly unable to compete with Vladivostok-Avia).
Is the review helpful? 4 / 1
02/09/2010 Danil
I regularly fly these planes on the Anadyr-Moscow route and back. Flight time 8 hours. Airline "Transaero". The last time I flew was in August 2009. I don’t know how many years this plane flew, but it seems that they are about 40 years old. All the inscriptions are in English and Arabic. Apparently got from some Arab airline. Not a single door in the toilet closes. I was sitting in the 3rd row of the economy class, the distance between the seats was so narrow that I had to sit for eight hours with my knees out of the way, the porthole rattled all the time and the barrel was blowing out of it. In general, a nightmare. Cattle truck!
Is the review helpful? 4 / 1
01/27/2010 Murys
I constantly fly Boeing 767-300 with Aeroflot Los Angeles-Moscow-Los Angeles (SU321/322). The planes are excellent: spacious, clean, comfortable seats. The flight is great: a variety of films and audio recordings pleases. Not discussed! Thanks to Boing for such planes, and to my dear Aeroflot for such a flight!
Is the review helpful? 0 / 2
01/13/2010 Guest Sandro
We flew by AEROFLOT from Moscow, 01/10/10. The flight was delayed for two hours. The plane is not new, but in good condition, although the TVs did not work very well. But the staff, or the crew, was at the highest level. I flew by AEROFLOT for the third time and the crew's professionalism always brightened up minor troubles that can occur in flight.
Is the review helpful? 0 / 1
01/10/2010 Rommel-KHB
We flew on the New Year holidays to Moscow by Aeroflot. There the flight was delayed for 6 hours, back to Khabarovsk for an hour. On the plane, it’s quite comfortable, it flies well, in general, Aeroflot pilots like it. What I didn’t like - you can see in the cabin that the plane is old - the upholstery material on the seats is all cracked, the TVs in the cabin, apparently, are still lamp-type, with impaired color reproduction - for example, in the first cabin the central TV shows more or less normally, the next in the cabin has always a red background, and the third is green. When flying to Moscow, the headphone jack did not work in my chair, I had to connect them in my wife's chair. When flying back in the first cabin, the air conditioning system was working hard, a rather sickly air stream was constantly blowing on the passengers. I saw how several passengers asked the stewards to reduce the flow, to which they received the answer that it was central system and they can't do anything. When we flew to Moscow, we were in the second cabin, there was no such nonsense with air conditioning. So if you fly on "A. Pushkin" - I recommend the second salon :) Well, or take seats in the center, it doesn't blow like that there.
And one more thing, who will fly through Sheremetyevo Terminal D - do not repeat our mistake, do not expect to eat normally after passing the inspection - there are only 2 cafes, one has an insane price tag and a lot of people. And in the second cafe there was a shift change that lasted almost forty minutes.
Is the review helpful? 1 / 0
11/06/2009 Guest
Excellent plane, flew in Siberia Moscow-Irkutsk for 5 hours, everything is fine. The distance between the seats and the height of the seats are good (unlike the a-310 is also Siberia, which is sometimes put in place of the b-767)
The Boeing 767-300 model is present in the product line of the largest manufacturer of civil and military aircraft Boeing. This is a wide-body airliner designed for long-distance routes, more often than other aircraft found on transatlantic flights.
Story
In 1972, some time after the wide-body aircraft under the 747 index entered the line, the Boeing company launched the design process for the next model under the code name 7X7. The initial idea of creating a short-haul passenger aircraft of increased capacity with a short takeoff did not arouse interest among potential clients, and the developer switched to creating a transcontinental liner. After working through several layout options, the designers chose a scheme reminiscent of the European Airbus A-300. During these years, aviation technology has reached an incredible high level. Powerful and economical aircraft engines of a new generation, composite structural materials appeared, new trends in aerodynamics were established. Improved fuel efficiency. All this was applied on Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft, which had unified cockpits, called glass cockpits. Such technologies meant the presence of displays instead of arrow indicators of instruments, the reduction of the crew to two people, the replacement of the navigator with the FMS flight control system. Computer modeling has been widely used.
The release of the aircraft model 767 was planned at the plant "Everett". The main model at first was the Boeing 767-200, its production started on 07/14/1978.
After a series of test flights and tests of several samples with different engines, the company certified the liner. Deliveries began in October 1982.
Specifications
The Boeing 767-300 and 767-300 ER modifications that appeared in 1983 aroused great interest among airlines. Having made the very first flight on 01/30/1986 (beginning of development - 1984), the Boeing 767 - 300 aircraft, the scheme of which resembles the famous Airbus A-320, entered commercial operation on 10/20/1986. The famous airline Japan Airlines became the first customer and owner.
The Boeing 767-300, whose cabin scheme allows you to take on board a large number of passengers and deliver them from one continent to another, was produced in the amount of 104 pieces. Statistically, this pattern crossed Atlantic Ocean more often than all other aircraft combined.
The Boeing 767-300 became a modification of the earlier version, the Boeing 767-200, extended by 6.43 meters. In addition to inserting two additional sections, the company carried out other improvements: the liner had a reinforced fuselage and landing gear. Gradually, this version was improved, it received the English Rolls-Royce RB 211 engines. The scope of the aircraft is the long routes of Europe and Asia, where its high reputation was greatly facilitated by 20-30% lower fuel costs compared to previous aircraft.
Having a wide cabin, the Boeing 767-300 is able to take on board from 218 passengers (up to a maximum of 350 people) with a crew of 2 people. The aircraft was assigned the ICAO code B763. With an aircraft length of 54.9 m and a wingspan of 47.6 m, the cabin width is from 4.72 to 5.03 m. Takeoff weight- 159.2 tons; the weight of the empty liner is 90.1 tons, the cruising speed reaches 851 km / h. At this speed, the flight range is 7900 km (in the 767-300 ER version - 11065 km). The power plant is represented by 2 General Electric CF6-80C2-84F turbofan engines (their thrust is 2 x 26260 kg / s), there are options with Rolls-Royce RB 211 engines.
Wings in 2010 received new endings called winglets.
The required length of the runway under standard ISA conditions when the vehicle is at sea level is 2300 m.
Passenger compartment
The Boeing 767-300 aircraft, whose cabin layout is a combination of two longitudinal aisles and several rows of seats distributed according to the 2 + 3 + 2 system (economy class), is designed for flights for many hours. Therefore, the cabin has several spacious compartments for hand luggage, an increased number of bathrooms, comfortable lighting, and excellent sound insulation. Aircraft seats of many airlines are equipped with multimedia systems.
Liner operation
There were practically no problems with the commissioning of the model. For example, for the entire first year of using the liner, 96.1% of aircraft took off and landed without delays. technical reasons. The cost-effectiveness and comfort of the liners perfectly met the requirements of the airlines. After changes in flight safety rules (ETOPS), which allowed twin-engine aircraft to fly on routes where the distance from the nearest emergency landing airfield should not exceed 120 minutes of flight time (previously this value was 90 minutes), sales of the Boeing 767-300 increased. The car was used especially intensively on transatlantic lines.
The described aircraft, like other modifications of this model, is popular among Russian airlines, the possibility of delivery is especially appreciated. a large number passengers on charter flights.
Conclusion
But the air travel crisis after 2001 led to a drop in demand for the Boeing 767-300. In 2003, the company began designing a successor under code name 7E7, later the development was given the name "Boeing 787 Dreamliner" (dream plane or dream plane). A lot of orders have been received, we are talking about a record number, but so far there are problems with the deployment of production and sales.
When you need to fly long distances, choose a Boeing. The plane is an airliner with a wide fuselage. The model is twin-engine, it was on it that the Atlantic Ocean was first flown.
The airplane came out in 1981. For 25 years, the aircraft has had time to prove itself as a reliable, economical, passenger-friendly liner. It is unsurpassed in its class by any model.
The Boeing 767 300 for Azur Air was first produced in 1983. The fuselage of the model is 6.5 meters longer than the base model, so forty more people can fit on board. The cargo compartment is more powerful, the chassis is reinforced. The wing was built according to a new modification, the thickness of the strut was increased, and the support area was added.
The liner has two passes. Such a successful cabin configuration is still used in aircraft for long-haul flights.
Boeing flight
How is the liner arranged?
The length of the Boeing reaches 54.94 meters. Purpose - medium and long-distance transportation. Liner design characteristics:
- Passenger comfort comes first;
- The noise from the engines in the cabin is almost inaudible;
- The flight is controlled by the onboard computer.
The cabin is assembled in accordance with the requirements of each carrier. Passenger capacity reaches from 224 to 350 if the aircraft is operated by a charter company.
Note! The liner is equipped with a cargo compartment with a volume of 114.2 cubic meters. Boeing is the record holder among aircraft intended for long-haul transportation. The airliner develops a speed of up to 910 kilometers per hour, flies a maximum of 11 thousand kilometers.
What is the liner inside?
The cabin layout of the boeing 767 300 of azur air is represented by the 2-4-2 option. Model 767-300 is the most popular, as the cab has a three-line seating arrangement and two aisles.
There are three configuration options for the aircraft:
- Three classes of seat layout: for the first, business class and tourist;
- Two classes: economic and business;
- If the flight is charter, then only one economy class.
View of the liner from the inside
three classes
Layout 2-2-2. There are six rows in total. The seats recline almost to a horizontal position, so there is no inconvenience for anyone during a long flight.
From 10 to 16 row is the first class economic type. Next are the toilets and the kitchen. After them is the first class up to the 26th row. Armchairs are arranged as 2-3-2. Lots of legroom, more than the next tourist branch. It is located between 27 and 42 rows. At the end are the toilets and the technical room.
two classes
Here, the cabin is not located immediately behind the cockpit, first comes the kitchen. The first five rows are business class. Total in cab of this type 30 chairs. The chairs recline 165 degrees, almost turning into a bed. Every passenger flying in business class will be able to sleep. The seats are wide, their transformation takes place using an electric drive. At the end of the classroom is the kitchen and toilets. The seating arrangement is 2-2-2.
Business Class
Economy class starts from row 11, it is located immediately behind the partition that separates it from the luxury seats. Seat arrangement formula: 2-3-2. Between 5 and 11 there are exits nearby. The class is divided into two parts, in the first block there are 25 rows, then there is a toilet and an emergency exit.
In the tail, economy class starts from row 26, the latter has number 36, behind which is the kitchen and exit.
One class - economic
Note! Economy class is used by airlines that fly charter flights.
The cabin fits 350 seats. There are 7 toilets:
- 4 at the back;
- 2 in the center;
- 1 ahead.
Armchairs have a layout in the form of 2-4-2. Seats with more legroom are more expensive. They are located near the emergency exit, so pregnant women, the disabled, parents with children cannot sit here.
How to choose the right place?
Boeing offers to sit in business class, where all seats are with increased comfort. Here, too, there are better seats - this is the first row, since it is located farthest from the toilets. There is less noise and distraction from enjoying the flight.
Salon scheme
Economy class has more legroom at the exit seats, tall people it's better to sit here. These places also have disadvantages: they are located next to the toilet!
In addition, not everyone is allowed to fly on them - we are talking about people with disabilities, pregnant women and parents with children.
On a note: For those who fly with a child, it is preferable to sit near the porthole to distract the baby with clouds and sky. It is better to choose seats near the toilet in order to less disturb other passengers with frequent visits to the bathroom.
For traveling as a couple, you should choose a place where there are two seats side by side, so as not to sit next to someone, so you can retire.
For those who are afraid to fly, it is better to sit down in the central part of the cabin between the aisles, so that it is away from the window.
Important! The worst place can be called a row at the tail of the aircraft. There are toilets and technical rooms at the back, so the fuss for passengers is guaranteed.
An uncomfortable place is also located in the center of the cabin between two rows, since there are three seats in a row, then sitting between two strangers, a person can experience double discomfort. In addition, if necessary, you will have to disturb the passenger sitting next to you all the time.
The layout of the cabin is distinguished by well-thought-out ergonomics, so every passenger, no matter where he sits, will be comfortable throughout the flight.
The best seats are where there is extra legroom, they are located near the emergency exits.
The airline that sends flights to Moscow or the Dominican Republic offers to fly in economy class. The layout of the seats is clearly visible in the photo.
Plane diagram
In total, the aircraft has 350 seats. This number is valid only for economy type class. The zf-9633 number guarantees reliability when flying.
A few more important points
Azur Air does not provide business class for its charter flights. There is no need to despair, comfortable places, anyway, can be found. Each seat is new and comfortable, they are all leather. In the middle of the aircraft, the luggage rack is able to lower and rise, turning around, thanks to a special mechanism. Such an innovation is unique to Boeing.
In flight, flight attendants serve not only food and drinks, but also lollipops from motion sickness. This kind of service shows concern. If the plane flies during the day, then there will be three meals a day, when flying at night, only drinks or food on demand. In the morning they give a bun, sausage, cheese, butter, tea, coffee. Hot during the day and evening. In addition to tea and coffee, water and juice are provided.
The second block of the economy class is not so convenient, here you cannot admire the view from the window, as the wings interfere. Seats near escape hatches have more legroom but limited ticket sales. Pregnant women, the disabled and children are not allowed to fly here.
View from the porthole
Closer to the tail there is more shaking. Lots of noise due to constantly passing passengers to the toilet.
by the most comfortable places for tall passengers there will be seats where you can stretch your legs. It's near the emergency hatches, side chairs. Ticket prices are higher for them.
Among the comfortable seats, one can single out seats on rows 1, 14, 32, side seats on rows 16 and 33. The first row has a plus in additional space, but a minus due to the proximity to the toilet, so the flight is accompanied by constant queues and noise.
Important! On the first row, it is better to sit down for the elderly and pregnant, it will be the closest to go to the toilet. There are also cradles for babies, so for passengers with small children, it is worth taking a ticket for these places.
12, 45, 46 row contain the worst places, as they are located near the toilets. Passengers sitting on the edge will constantly be touched by those passing to the bathroom. There is more noise from the constant conversations following the toilet. The seatback in these rows does not recline. The 46th row is squeezed by two bathrooms, there are two cabins at the back, which increases anxiety at times.
Sitting in the back is bad because of the shaking, severe motion sickness, when the plane lands, the ears hurt. Such problems will turn the flight into a test.
Three layouts of the Boeing cabin used by different airlines were considered. The scheme for azure is standard: 2-4-2. Since this airline offers a charter flight, the flight class will be purely economic.
The Boeing 767-300 is a large airliner designed for a maximum load of 350 people. It has been produced for about 30 years, but this does not prevent the model from being popular and being used in many airlines around the world. The fact that Roman Abramovich has just such an aircraft speaks volumes. During operation it was "lost" only 17 aircraft and, unfortunately, 2 of them caused the tragedy in the USA on September 11, 2001.
Boeing 767-300 parameters
- Length- 54.5 meters.
- Wingspan- 47.6 meters.
- Height- 15.8 meters.
- Flight range (maximum) - 11,300 kilometers.
- Max Height - 13,200 km.
- Max speed - 914 km / h.
- The weight empty plane - 86 tons.
- takeoff weight- 186 880 kg.
Azur Air is a private company owned by the Turkish Anex holding. It mainly operates charter flights to popular tourist destinations. On the this moment has in its fleet 7 Boeing 767-300.
These aircraft are designed for medium to long haul flights. If you look at the board of flights, then they are all not close - Thailand, Mexico, India, Vietnam, Spain, Tunisia, the Dominican Republic. There are also domestic flights.
The salon consists exclusively of economy class seats, so choosing the best seats will be problematic. Due to the heavy workload, the aircraft has 2 kitchens in the bow and 7 toilets - 1 in the bow, 2 in the center and 4 in the tail of the aircraft.
All seats are divided into three rows. There are 4 chairs in the central one, 2 in the side ones, which is very convenient for those who travel together.
Unfortunately, in last years airlines began to share seats in the cabins. More popular and convenient to sell at a premium. Azur Air has special places Azur Space. It costs 1000-1500 more, depending on the flight range.
Why are they better?
The distance between the chairs is about 1 meter, you can stretch your legs - this is true for tall people.
But there are also limitations. Pregnant women, minors, disabled people and passengers with children cannot be on them. In addition, if the airline changes the plane, you lose your right to upgraded seats. It says so in the terms and conditions. "Azur Air". Where are these places? In the 1st row, just behind the cockpit and in front of the emergency exits.
Azur Space Enhanced Seats Scheme
bow
- The entire 1 row - places A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H.
middle of the cabin
- 14 row - places C, D, E in the central row.
- 16 row - places A, B and G, H on the sides (near the windows).
- 32 row - places C, D, E, F in the central row.
- 33rd row - places A, B and G, H on the sides (near the windows).
True, it should be noted that the 14th and 16th rows are located right next to the toilet. What is more important to you is up to you.
By the way, not everyone likes to have a large space in front of them. At the moment the aircraft descends, some passengers instinctively seek support. On the places Azur Space you will not find such a support in the form of standing chairs in front.
Convenient places
In addition to the officially recognized the best places You can also find those for which you do not have to pay extra.
For those who fly together, these will be all side seats. You don't have to ask for them strangers skip you and also no one will wade through you. You can safely go about your business - sleep, eat, watch a movie or listen to music.
Some passengers like to sit "at the window", some - on the contrary, are terribly afraid to look down. Someone prefers only the bow, someone likes to look at the wing, and someone wants to sit in the tail, because he once heard that in the event of an accident there is a chance for survival. Therefore, each passenger chooses convenient places for himself.
Awkward places
Traditionally, these will be places near the toilets. More precisely - 12, 14, 15, 16 rows at the transition of the new part to the central and 45, 46 rows in the tail itself. Apart from unpleasant sounds and smells, you will be “exhausted” by those constantly walking and slamming doors who want to “wash their hands”. However, on short flights the planes are quite clean, the second factor is much more annoying.
The next series of uncomfortable places is in the very center of the cabin. These are places D, E. In any case, you will have to ask someone to let you through if necessary. This is inconvenient, even if your close person. It is good if the flight is short and the need arises infrequently.
In addition, there is a lot of crowding in the central row. Surrounding passengers are in your personal comfort zone, which not everyone likes. This is partly why most people find flying an airplane uncomfortable.
Why choose comfortable seats and how to survive a long flight?
The question is rhetorical. It is asked by those who have never flown more than 3-4 hours. Imagine a flight from Moscow to Southeast Asia, which lasts 9-10 hours, or to the American continent - across the ocean, which is even longer. How to spend so much time in one position? Yes, and squeezed from all sides by neighbors. You'll be lucky if you can sleep.
Therefore, it is better not to pump yourself up with alcohol, but take a small dose of a sedative. So you don't break the law and you will "in adequate". Keep in mind that a drunk person can be removed from the flight both at the airport of departure and at the destination. What's even more embarrassing.
If you have problems with the spine and blood vessels, be sure to take medication with you and try to change the position of the body if possible. Buy yourself an inflatable pillow in advance. Some airlines even give them out, but it won't take up much room in your luggage.
Pleasant flight!
Boeing 767 is a wide-body aircraft for medium and long distance flights. The first to pass international certification for intercontinental flights over the oceans, as a machine with two engines.
The debut flight took place in 1981. Commercial use began next year. The airliner was slightly inferior to Airbus aircraft in range. Boeing immediately began developing a project for longer routes. One by one, the Boeing 767-200ER and Boeing 767-300 were born. The first possessed the best performance in range, and the second in terms of capacity.
In 1987, Japanese freighters received the first B767-300.
The developers increased the length of the fuselage by more than six meters, other dimensions were the same. Passenger capacity has increased by almost a quarter. Maximum amount seats - 360.
The first engines were made by General Electric and Pratt & Whitney, then Rolls Royce also participated in the production. The power parameters of the motors of this company had great traction. Customers, subsequently, chose the engines at their discretion.
The operating costs of the airliner are significantly reduced, thanks to the use of modern technologies. A more comfortable level for passengers and pilots has been created.
The latest Boeing design has the best fuel efficiency, reduced noise. There is an electronic control system on board.
In the manufacture of the case, all advanced technologies at that time were used: flexible and durable alloys and materials.
The passenger compartment has a two-way system, which is more convenient, according to carriers. The interior space has been expanded by 1.5 meters, which allows you to take on board more passengers.
The cargo compartment has also been enlarged, its capacity is almost half that of aircraft of the same class.
Competitive advantages and modifications of the Boeing 767 - 300
Since the start of operation in 1982, the Boeing 767 has carried more than eight hundred million passengers. The average flight time for all produced cars of this family is about ten hours a day. Many wide-body competitors are no longer flying, much less being produced. This aircraft has been produced for more than three decades, and is actively operated to the present.
Commercial carriers have adopted the abbreviated model designation. For example, Boeing 767 - 300 is called B763, and 767 - 200 is usually abbreviated as B762.
Boeing 767-300 base model has a fuselage length of 54.94 meters. Currently, these models are gradually being replaced by the Boeing 787 - 8. In total, more than 700 aircraft were produced. different models this row.
Boeing 767-300ER- This is an elongated airbus that travels long distances. In 1989, this car with two powerful engines covered the distance from the US to the state of Hawaii. Manufacturers increased the takeoff weight to almost 190 tons, increased the volume of fuel tanks. Such conversions were necessary for the desired range of flights. Examples of 763ER routes are impressive: from Los Angeles to Germany, as well as from Moscow to Beijing. The stretched 763ER became the best selling and most used of the B767 line. The aircraft of this modification is owned by billionaire Roman Abramovich.
767-300F is the cargo version of the 763 ER. The huge machine holds twenty-four pallets measuring 2.2 m * 3.2 m on one deck, almost thirty on the second. A large hatch is provided on the upper deck for loading and unloading. On the lower deck there are three doors for the same purposes.
Freight Boeing 763 F was planned to be converted into military aircraft. Military - air force The USA saw these models as tankers, military transport vehicles and other purposes. These episodes were never released.
Flight - technical parameters Boeing 767 300
- Aircraft length - 54.94 meters
- Wingspan - 47.57 meters
- Passenger capacity - from 219 to 360
- Maximum takeoff weight - up to 187,000 kilograms
- Weight of an empty liner - up to 90,000 kilograms
- Flight range - up to 11,500 kilometers
- Cruise flight speed - up to 852 km / h
Location and description of the best seats in the cabin 767 ER (diagram)
This model can accommodate up to 370 passengers. There are two classes of saloons here.
From the first to the fifth row there are seats for a business class cabin. The best are chairs in 1, 2, 3 and 4 rows. The seats of the fifth row are located near utility rooms: kitchens and bathrooms. However, the business lounge is separated from the rest by a partition or screen, which still favors a more relaxed flight.
From the eleventh to the thirty-ninth row (depending on the models), there are economy class seats. Unlike the previous, higher class, the seats are arranged according to the 2/3/2 scheme. Therefore, the passages in this embodiment are much narrower. The gaps between the rows are sufficient, but the best ones are still in the 11th and 27th rows. There is no row of seats in front of them, and there are no backrests that recline on the passenger.
When ordering tickets, please note that seats preceding the emergency exit (row 25) may be limited in reclining backs. They may even be blocked.
The thirty-eighth row, the last one, is traditionally the worst option. The seatbacks can be fixed in one position. There is a bathroom in the tail section, so frequent walking of people will disturb from time to time. Queues can also line up, which will interfere with a comfortable rest in flight.
All seats on an airplane have their advantages and disadvantages. So, places near the windows are traditionally a priority. But when you go out, you need to disturb your neighbor. If you get an aisle seat, the passenger is prevented from walking in the cabin.
In general, many will appreciate the large, roomy, comfortable interior.
Long history of success
Boeing 767 - 300 is perhaps one of the most accomplished and successful models of the great aircraft manufacturing company. For many decades, the popular airliner has been cost-effective and competitive.
Many more specimens of this family are currently in operation. They are gradually being replaced by modernized Boeing machines.
The Boeing 763 has become a timely, progressive and successful project in the history of aircraft construction.
Loading...